ArticleScientific reports2025
The novel CKD-INF score for distinguishing infectious from non-infectious inflammation in patients with non-dialysis chronic kidney disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- How to quickly determine whether patients with chronic cough need corticosteroid treatment--construction of a predictive model for corticosteroid-responsive cough in chronic cough.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2026Article
- Machine-learning prediction of 30-day infection-related hospitalization in advanced CKD.BMC infectious diseases · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Our study analyzed 831 non-dialysis chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients admitted from January 2007 to January 2023, using 665 for creating and 166 for validating the CKD-Infectious Inflammation (CKD-INF) score. This score distinguishes inflammation types using logistic regression outcomes and aligns with the International Sepsis Definition Conference criteria. The study's participants had an average age of 76.2 ± 11.2 years, with 37% female and over half diagnosed with diabetes. The resulting score was as follows:[Formula: see text] where NLR refers to the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, CRP to C-reactive protein, and WBC indicates white blood cell count. CKD-INF exhibited a higher AUC of 0.85 (with a 95% CI of 0.82-0.87), higher sensitivity (75.3%) and specificity (82%) compared to its components including CRP. The CKD-INF score showed higher weighted κ values (0.57) for infection prediction at hospital admission than its individual components. In both training and validation groups, the CKD-INF score outperformed CRP as a predictor of infection in univariate and multivariate analyses. The CKD-INF score, derived from routine laboratory tests, can be an effective tool for predicting infections in CKD patients, potentially aiding in their early management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.