ArticleScientific reports2025
Emissions from conventional and electronic waterpipes relative to cigarettes and a heated tobacco product.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Harms associated with the use of smoked tobacco products, including waterpipes, are due to inhalational exposure to toxicants either present in tobacco or formed during the process of combustion. We assessed levels of 37 toxicants in aerosol emissions from conventional waterpipe heated with different charcoals and also with a heat management device (HMD), from the IQOS heated tobacco product (HTP), and the 'OOKA' electronic waterpipe. We also utilised literature data on toxicant yields in 3R4F reference cigarette smoke. When taking use patterns into account, toxicant yields were substantially lower in conventional waterpipe aerosol compared with cigarette smoke. Toxicant yields in electronic waterpipe aerosol were substantially lower than those in conventional waterpipe aerosol, both on a per session basis and when taking typical use patterns into account. Numerous toxicants in conventional waterpipe aerosol were absent in electronic waterpipe aerosol. In summary, during typical use conventional waterpipe emits fewer, and lower levels of, a number of toxicants relative to combustible cigarette smoke. In addition, electronically heating shisha further reduces toxicant levels, and many toxicants are absent in OOKA electronic waterpipe aerosol. These findings have important implications concerning toxicant exposure among waterpipe users, and for understanding how to potentially reduce health risks associated with waterpipe use.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.