ArticleScientific reports2025
M-NIG: mobile network information gain for EEG-based epileptic seizure prediction.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Feature fusion ensemble classification approach for epileptic seizure prediction using electroencephalographic bio-signals.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Epilepsy is one of the most common cerebral diseases, the development of which can be divided into four states: interictal state, preictal state, ictal state and postictal state. Hunting for critical states is of great significance to predict seizures. This study seeks to establish a general-purpose method for epileptic seizure prediction by constructing individual-specific correlation networks between multi-channel EEG signals. In this paper, we present the mobile network information gain (M-NIG) method by transforming floating time series datasets into stable network information gain, which reduces the impact of data noise, thereby improving the robustness and effectiveness of the algorithm. The method not only efficiently predicts seizures but also detects their DNB channels. The proposed method attains an average of 97.40% accuracy, 94.32% sensitivity, 97.48% specificity, and FPR = 0.024/h on 22 patients from the public CHB-MIT scalp EEG database, which outperforms most state-of-the-art articles. Additionally, it achieves an average of 95.70% accuracy, 100.00% sensitivity, 95.56% specificity, and FPR = 0.044/h on a dataset collected at Taian Maternity and Child Health Hospital, which outperforms most state-of-the-art articles in terms of sensitivity, accuracy, and FPR. Our experiments show that the parameters of sliding window and the number of nearest neighbor of k-nearest neighbor (KNN) are important factors affecting prediction performance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.