ArticleScientific reports2025
Platelet-rich plasma as a potential antimicrobial agent against multidrug-resistant bacteria in diabetic foot infections.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Platelet Rich Plasma as a Potential Therapy for Chronic Toxoplasmosis in Immunocompetent and Immunocompromised Murine Model.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Platelet-rich therapies in cutaneous and mucocutaneous disorders characterized by inflammatory tissue responses: mechanistic insights and clinical evidence.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
- Article
- Antibacterial and antibiofilm activity of platelet-rich plasma under different activation conditions against multidrug-resistant MRSA isolated from human skin abscesses.BMC biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Diabetes mellitus is a global public health concern, with diabetic foot infections (DFIs) being common clinical complications among affected patients. Bacterial isolates resistant to commonly used antimicrobial drugs are becoming more prevalent in DFIs. Some research suggests that platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may inhibit bacterial growth, making it a promising biological therapy. Therefore, an in vitro experimental study was conducted on 53 multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial strains isolated from DFIs. The isolates were methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), MDR Klebsiella pneumoniae, and MDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa. The antibacterial activity of PRP was assessed using Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method, broth microdilution method, checkerboard synergy testing, and time-kill assay. The time-kill assay demonstrated that PRP's antibacterial efficacy peaked during the second hour of incubation for MRSA and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, but peaked at the first hour for Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, the PPR's efficiency against all isolates decreased after the peak point, with no antibacterial activity observed at the 24th h of incubation. Additionally, biofilm inhibition and eradication assays revealed that PRP has no effect on biofilm formation. As a result, PRP has the ability to inhibit bacterial growth, although this effect is transient and depends on the bacterial strain.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.