Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307307›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

A cross-national analysis of demographic variation in daily smoking across 22 countries.

Sung Joon Jang, Pedro A de la Rosa, R Noah Padgett, Matt Bradshaw, Tyler J VanderWeele, Byron R Johnson

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sung Joon JangBaylor University, Waco, USA. Sung_Joon_Jang@baylor.edu.
Pedro A de la RosaUniversity of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain.
R Noah PadgettHarvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Matt BradshawBaylor University, Waco, USA.
Tyler J VanderWeeleHarvard University, Cambridge, USA.
Byron R JohnsonBaylor University, Waco, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cigarette use, a leading cause of preventable disease and millions of deaths worldwide each year, is not often studied separately from other tobacco use, and global data and previous studies on cigarette smoking are based mostly on its prevalence rather than quantity. To address these oversights, we analyze the first wave of data from Global Flourishing Study, a study of over 200,000 adults nationally representative of 22 countries. We measured cigarette smoking by daily consumption per capita (mean) and per individual who smoked (intensity) as well as prevalence. The mean of daily smoking was positively correlated with the prevalence, whereas the intensity was not significantly related to the prevalence. Similarly, we found that random effects meta-analysis results of country-specific means of daily smoking in each category of demographic variables (age, gender, marital status, employment, religious service attendance, education, and immigration status) were more consistent with the results of prevalence than was the case with intensity, though there was variation across countries. Overall findings indicate the importance of studying the intensity as well as prevalence of smoking, as they are distinct and thus both required in order to assess tobacco-associated health risks and establish informed tobacco control policies.

Indexed as

Cigarette SmokingSmokingAdolescentAdultAgedDemographyFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrevalenceYoung AdultCigarette smokingCross-nationalGlobal flourishing studyRandom effects meta-analysis

Identifiers

PMID40307307
PMCPMC12043897

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.