ArticleScientific reports2025
Childhood predictors of charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Detecting age differences in prosociality using a newly developed picture-based measure.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- A comparative "report card" wellbeing assessment of 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.Discover global society · 2026Article
- The Global Flourishing Study: Study Profile and Initial Results on Flourishing.Nature. Mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While prior work documents the individual and societal benefits of prosocial behaviors, less is known about how childhood experiences shape prosociality in adulthood. Using data from the Global Flourishing Study, a diverse and international sample of 202,898 individuals across 22 countries, we examined associations between 11 candidate childhood predictors (i.e., relationship with mother, relationship with father, parental marital status, financial status, experience of abuse, feeling like an outsider, childhood health, immigration status, religious service attendance, gender, age) with two prosocial behaviors in adulthood, charitable giving and helping strangers, and whether these associations varied by country. Random effects meta-analyses pooling estimates across all 22 countries showed evidence of associations between some candidate childhood predictors and an increased likelihood of both subsequent charitable giving and helping, and sensitivity analyses showed that associations with several (e.g., experiencing abuse, feeling like an outsider, age 12 religious service attendance) were at least moderately robust to unmeasured confounding. Of note, childhood factors did not uniformly predict both charitable giving and helping. Variations in the magnitude and direction of associations were also evident between countries, possibly reflecting diverse national influences on prosocial behaviors. With further research, these findings may inform policy and practice aimed at fostering prosociality around the world.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.