Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307293›Full record

ArticleScientific data2025

Rethinking the production and publication of machine-readable expressions of research findings.

Markus Stocker, Lauren Snyder, Matthew Anfuso, Oliver Ludwig, Freya Thießen, Kheir Eddine Farfar, Muhammad Haris, Allard Oelen, Mohamad Yaser Jaradeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Markus StockerTIB - Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, 30167, Hannover, Germany. markus.stocker@tib.eu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5492-3212
Lauren SnyderTIB - Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, 30167, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6543-9565
Matthew AnfusoLeibniz University Hannover, Institute of Data Science, 30167, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-8448-0130
Oliver LudwigLeibniz University Hannover, Institute of Data Science, 30167, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3407-6963
Freya ThießenTIB - Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, 30167, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2513-6543
Kheir Eddine FarfarTIB - Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, 30167, Hannover, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0366-4596
Muhammad HarisTIB - Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, 30167, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5071-1658
Allard OelenTIB - Leibniz Information Centre for Science and Technology, 30167, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9924-9153
Mohamad Yaser JaradehL3S Research Center, 30167, Hannover, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8777-2780

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) 460234259EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 819536Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz Universität Hannover (Leibniz University Hannover) FlexFunds-2022-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scientific literature is the primary expression of scientific knowledge and an important source of research data. However, scientific knowledge expressed in narrative text documents is not inherently machine readable. To facilitate knowledge reuse, knowledge must be extracted from articles and organized into databases post-publication. The high time costs and inaccuracies associated with completing these activities manually has driven the development of techniques that automate knowledge extraction. Tackling the problem with a different mindset, we propose a pre-publication approach, known as reborn, that ensures scientific knowledge is born readable, i.e. produced in a machine-readable format with formal data syntax during knowledge production. We implement the approach using the Open Research Knowledge Graph infrastructure for FAIR scientific knowledge organization. With a focus on statistical research findings, we test the approach with three use cases in soil science, computer science, and agroecology. Our results suggest that the proposed approach is superior compared to classical manual and semi-automated post-publication extraction techniques in terms of knowledge accuracy, richness, and reproducibility as well as technological simplicity.

Identifiers

PMID40307293
PMCPMC12043899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.