Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307288›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

An exploratory cross-national analysis of the childhood predictors of inner peace in the Global Flourishing Study.

Tim Lomas, R Noah Padgett, James L Ritchie-Dunham, Matthew T Lee, James O Pawelski, Koichiro Shiba, Byron R Johnson, Tyler J VanderWeele

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Tim LomasHarvard University, Cambridge, USA. tlomas@hsph.harvard.edu.
R Noah PadgettHarvard University, Cambridge, USA.
James L Ritchie-DunhamUniversity of Texas at Austin, Austin, USA.
Matthew T LeeBaylor University, Waco, USA.
James O PawelskiUniversity of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.
Koichiro ShibaBoston University, Boston, USA.
Byron R JohnsonBaylor University, Waco, USA.
Tyler J VanderWeeleHarvard University, Cambridge, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Great efforts have been expended studying how people's childhood affects their life in adulthood. Although attention has mostly focused on 'negative' outcomes, such as mental illness, paradigms like positive psychology have encouraged interest in desirable phenomena too. Yet amidst this 'positive turn' some desiderata have still received scant engagement, including inner peace. This lacuna perhaps reflects the Western-centric nature of academia, with low arousal positive emotions regarded as being relatively undervalued in the West. But aligning with broader efforts to redress this Western-centricity is an emergent literature on this topic. This report adds to this by presenting cross-sectional wave 1 data from the most ambitious longitudinal study to date of inner peace, namely as an item - "In general, how often do you feel you are at peace with your thoughts and feelings?" - in the Global Flourishing Study, an intended five-year study investigating the predictors of human flourishing involving (in this first year) 202,898 participants from 22 countries. This exploratory paper looks at 13 childhood predictors of peace, using random effects meta-analysis to aggregate all findings, focusing on three research questions. First, how do recalled aspects of a child's upbringing predict peace in adulthood, for which the most impactful factor on average was self-rated health growing up, with Risk Ratios, relative to "good", ranging from 0.93 for "poor" to 1.07 for "excellent". Second, do associations vary by country, with the effect of poor self-rated health spanning 0.37 in Turkey to 1.19 in Nigeria. Third, are relationships robust to potential unmeasured confounding, as assessed by E-values, for which the effect of poor health growing up is robust up to an unmeasured confounder association Risk Ratio of 1.36 with inner peace. These results shed valuable new light on the long-term causal dynamics of this overlooked but important topic.

Indexed as

Psychological Well-BeingAdolescentAdultChildCross-Sectional StudiesEmotionsFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultCross-culturalFlourishingGlobalGlobal Flourishing StudyPeaceWellbeing

Identifiers

PMID40307288
PMCPMC12044011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.