ArticleScientific reports2025
Association of nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy with Parkinson disease in chronic hepatitis B patients.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Prolonged therapy using nucleos(t)ide analogs (NUC) is inevitable in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) infection, but its long-term impact on Parkinson's disease (PD) risk remains unclear. This study evaluated the association between NUC therapy and PD incidence in a nationwide CHB cohort. The study population comprised the National Health Insurance Service claims database from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2013, only included treatment naïve CHB patients and those without previously diagnosed with PD. Participants were followed until PD diagnosis or study completion. The primary outcome was PD incidence, comparing patients who initiated NUC therapy at cohort entry with those who did not. Over the 7.9-year study period, the incidence rate of PD in NUC-treated patients was 1.48 per 1000 persons, compared to 1.95 per 1000 persons in the untreated group. In an adjusted competing risk model, the 3-year follow-up showed a statistically significant reduction in risk (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.39-0.97). In the propensity score-matched cohort of 18,365 pairs, the cumulative incidence during 2-4 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the NUC-treated group compared to the untreated group. However, no statistically significant difference in cumulative PD incidence was observed between the groups at the early or late stages of the follow-up period. NUC therapy initially reduced PD incidence, but this protective effect diminished over time, indicating a time-varying effect. Regular PD screening may be needed for long-term NUC users.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.