ArticleScientific reports2025
Childhood predictors of volunteering across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comparative "report card" wellbeing assessment of 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.Discover global society · 2026Article
- Childhood predictors of charitable giving and helping across 22 countries in the Global Flourishing Study.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- The Global Flourishing Study: Study Profile and Initial Results on Flourishing.Nature. Mental health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While prior work documents individual and societal benefits to volunteering, less is known about how childhood experiences shape volunteering in adulthood around the world. Using data from the Global Flourishing Study, a diverse and international sample of 202,898 individuals across 22 countries, we examined 11 candidate childhood predictors of volunteering in adulthood, and whether these associations varied by country. Random effects meta-analyses showed evidence of associations between several childhood predictors and an increased likelihood of subsequent volunteering, including having a good relationship with one's father, comfortable subjective financial status, childhood abuse, feeling like an outsider growing up, more frequent religious service attendance at age 12, and being male. Sensitivity analyses showed that several of these associations were at least moderately robust to unmeasured confounding. There was little evidence of several other predictors (e.g., relationship with mother, parental marital status, self-rated health, immigration status, and year of birth) being associated with adulthood volunteering. Associations between childhood predictors and volunteering varied between countries, reflecting diverse societal influences. These findings enhance our understanding of childhood predictors of volunteering in adulthood and, with further research, provide valuable evidence for informing policy and practice aimed at fostering volunteering globally.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.