ArticleNature communications2025
Reinforcement learning increasingly relates to memory specificity from childhood to adulthood.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Increasing representational capacity in the hippocampal-frontoparietal system underlies hierarchical development of temporal memory.Developmental cognitive neuroscience · 2026Review
- Perceptual and conceptual influences on memory judgments.Communications psychology · 2026Article
- Reinforcement learning increasingly relates to memory specificity from childhood to adulthood.Nature communications · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In some contexts, abstract stimulus representations can effectively promote reward pursuit, whereas in others, detailed representations are needed to guide choice. Here, we ask how, across development, the reward statistics of the environment influence the specificity of both value-guided learning computations and recognition memory. Across two experiments (N = 224), we show that participants ages 8 - 25 years adaptively up- and down-weight detailed versus broader stimulus representations and that these learning computations relate to mnemonic specificity. When participants place greater weight on granular representations during learning, they better remember stimulus details, whereas when they place greater weight on broader representations, they show enhanced memory only for categorical information. Moreover, the strength of the coupling between learning and memory specificity increases with age. We demonstrate that from early in life, reward shapes the granularity with which the world is partitioned, and increasingly across development, the specificity with which experiences are remembered.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.