Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307220›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Reinforcement learning increasingly relates to memory specificity from childhood to adulthood.

Kate Nussenbaum, Catherine A Hartley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Kate NussenbaumNew York University, New York, NY, USA. katenuss@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7185-6880
Catherine A HartleyNew York University, New York, NY, USA. cate@nyu.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0177-7295

Funding

Interactive development of reinforcement learning and adaptive memoryR01MH126183 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI Catherine Alexandra Hartley · 2021 to 2026
$3.8M
The development of adaptive specificity in learning and memoryF31MH129105 · NIMH · NEW YORK UNIVERSITY · PI NUSSENBAUM, KATE · 2022 to 2023
$50k
American Psychological Association (American Psychological Association, Inc.) Dissertation Research AwardNIMH NIH HHS F31 MH129105NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH126183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In some contexts, abstract stimulus representations can effectively promote reward pursuit, whereas in others, detailed representations are needed to guide choice. Here, we ask how, across development, the reward statistics of the environment influence the specificity of both value-guided learning computations and recognition memory. Across two experiments (N = 224), we show that participants ages 8 - 25 years adaptively up- and down-weight detailed versus broader stimulus representations and that these learning computations relate to mnemonic specificity. When participants place greater weight on granular representations during learning, they better remember stimulus details, whereas when they place greater weight on broader representations, they show enhanced memory only for categorical information. Moreover, the strength of the coupling between learning and memory specificity increases with age. We demonstrate that from early in life, reward shapes the granularity with which the world is partitioned, and increasingly across development, the specificity with which experiences are remembered.

Indexed as

LearningMemoryReinforcement, PsychologyAdolescentAdultChildFemaleHumansMaleRecognition, PsychologyRewardYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40307220
PMCPMC12043828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.