Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40307205›Full record

ArticleNature communications2025

Energy requirements for securing wellbeing in Switzerland and the space for affluence and inequality.

Joel Millward-Hopkins, Vivien Fisch-Romito, Sascha Nick, Emile Chevrel

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Joel Millward-HopkinsUniversity of Lausanne (UNIL), Quartier Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland. joeltmh@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4189-1658
Vivien Fisch-RomitoUniversity of Lausanne (UNIL), Quartier Centre, Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2419-196X
Sascha NickSwiss Federal Technology Institute of Lausanne (EPFL), Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2122-1676
Emile ChevrelETH Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The idea that human needs should be secured for all people is largely uncontroversial, and recent research demonstrates that decent living standards could be secured for all, globally, with far lower energy and resource use than today. However, how the energy requirements of decent living vary across populations is poorly understood - particularly in high-income countries-and important questions regarding inequality remain unexplored. Here we show how, with a fairer distribution of energy, Switzerland could dramatically reduce energy consumption while securing wellbeing for all. We advance previous work on energy and wellbeing by decomposing an established net-zero scenario into the energy required to support human needs, and that related to affluence or excess. We estimate decent living energy in 2050 at 19.5 gigajoules per capita (18-26 gigajoules in varying subnational contexts), making it only ~13% of Switzerland's 2019 energy footprint, and ~23% of that projected in the net-zero scenario. This highlights the theoretical potential for affluent countries to move towards a more just, egalitarian global distribution of energy and resource consumption, while securing wellbeing for their own citizens.

Identifiers

PMID40307205
PMCPMC12043928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.