ArticleBMJ open2025
Comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions on kinesiophobia in patients with chronic non-specific low back pain: a study protocol for a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionKinesiophobia is a significant factor which influences the prognosis of patients with chronic non-specific low back pain (CNLBP). The restriction of functional training can severely impede functional recovery and contribute to negative emotional states (including anxiety and depression) and a heightened risk of insomnia while exacerbating the economic burden on patients. Although several randomised controlled trials have evaluated the effects of various non-pharmacological interventions on kinesiophobia in CNLBP, their relative efficacy and potential adverse effects remain ambiguous. This study will conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to identify which non-pharmacological intervention may represent the most effective treatment for kinesiophobia in patients with CNLBP. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Comprehensive searches will be conducted across English and Chinese databases (including The Cochrane Library, PubMed, Scopus, Springer, Embase, Wanfang Data, the Chongqing VIP Database and China National Knowledge Infrastructure) from the date of their inception to 20 November 2024. Only Chinese or English studies will be considered for analysis. The primary outcomes will include a significant reduction in secondary movement phobia associated with CNLBP, pain alleviation and enhancement of the functional status of the lumbar muscles. The Cochrane Bias Risk Assessment Tool will be used to conduct a bias risk assessment.Pairwise meta-analysis will be performed by Review Manager V.5.3 software, Stata V.16.0 and Open BUGS V.3.2.3 software will be used to conduct a network meta-analysis. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation framework will be employed to assess the quality of evidence. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: All of the data included in this study will be derived from the literature; therefore, ethical approval is not necessary. The findings will be disseminated via peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024605343.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.