ArticleBMJ open2025
Evidence-based practice usage, knowledge and attitudes of healthcare professionals: a nationwide survey in the Maldives.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesEvidence-based practice (EBP) is considered an essential principle to arrive at and ensure high-quality healthcare. This study aimed to determine the current knowledge, attitude and awareness among doctors, nurses and allied healthcare workers in the Maldives regarding the principles of EBP and the barriers experienced when practising EBP. DESIGN AND
settingA nationwide, cross-sectional, semiquantitative, digital survey was conducted in 2023 among nurses, doctors and allied healthcare professionals currently working in any healthcare setting in the Maldives. The survey was based on the validated McColl and BARRIERS questionnaires. In addition, basic demographic characteristics of the participants were collected.
resultsOut of the more than 1000 healthcare professionals invited, 418 responded. The vast majority were female nurses. About half of the respondents worked in a tertiary hospital and had obtained a bachelor's degree in nursing. EBP was considered (very) useful and relevant for clinical practice, but the attitude towards and promotion of EBP was considered insufficient. Respondents preferred research utilisation through evidence-based guidelines. Slightly over half (52.1%) of the respondents had followed some course in literature searching or EBP. Only one in six respondents thought they had access to PubMed. The highest scoring barriers for EBP were related to organisational challenges; lack of knowledge, reluctance to change among healthcare professionals and management, and lack of time or high workload.
conclusionMaldivian healthcare professionals welcome EBP but face organisational and practical challenges to implement this principle in clinical practice. A multidisciplinary team of EBP champions appears useful to promote EBP awareness and skills on a national scale.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.