ArticleBMJ open2025
Development and evaluation of prediction models to improve the hospital appointments overbooking strategy at a large tertiary care hospital in the Sultanate of Oman: a retrospective analysis.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveMissed hospital appointments are common among outpatients and have significant clinical and economic consequences. The purpose of this study is to develop a predictive model of missed hospital appointments and to evaluate different overbooking strategies. STUDY
designRetrospective cross-sectional analysis.
settingOutpatient clinics of the Royal Hospital in Muscat, Oman.
participantsAll outpatient clinic appointments scheduled between January 2014 and February 2021 (n=947 364). PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES: Predictive models were created using logistic regression for the entire cohort and individual practices to predict missed hospital appointments. The performance of the models was evaluated using a holdout set. Simulations were performed to compare the effectiveness of predictive model-based overbooking and organisational overbooking in optimising appointment utilisation.
resultsOf the 947 364 outpatient appointments booked, 201 877 (21.3%) were missed. The proportion of missed appointments varied by clinic, ranging from 13.8% in oncology to 28.3% in urology. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for the overall predictive model was 0.771 (95% CI: 0.768 to 0.775), while the AUC for the clinic-specific predictive model was 0.845 (95% CI: 0.836 to 0.855) for oncology and 0.738 (95% CI: 0.732 to 0.744) for paediatrics. The overbooking strategy based on the predictive model outperformed systematic overbooking, with shortages of available appointments at 10.4% in oncology and 25.0% in gastroenterology.
conclusionsPredictive models can effectively estimate the probability of missing a hospital appointment with high accuracy. Using these models to guide overbooking strategies can enable better appointment scheduling without burdening clinics and reduce the impact of missed appointments.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.