ArticleBMJ open2025
Adipose tissue-derived versus bone marrow-derived cell concentrates for the injective treatment of knee osteoarthritis: protocol of a prospective randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06040957 (Bone Marrow vs Adipose Tissue as a Cell Source for Infiltrative Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis), which is not on this map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Bone Marrow vs Adipose Tissue as a Cell Source for Infiltrative Treatment of Knee Osteoarthritis: Randomized Clinical Trial
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of arthrocentesis combined with different drug injections for arthrogenic temporomandibular disorders: a network meta-analysis of randomized trials.BMC oral health · 2026Pooled it
- Investigating Sex-Linked miRNAs for Potential Osteoarthritis Therapy Biomarkers.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- Gender-related differences in spontaneous osteoclastogenesis in knee osteoarthritis: A potential peripheral biomarker for early disease progression.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
- Micro-fragmented adipose tissue for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis: A prospective pilot study at 1-year follow-up.Journal of experimental orthopaedics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionIntra-articular injections of mesenchymal stromal cells concentrates showed promising results in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA). Among these, bone marrow aspirate concentrate (BMAC) has been widely adopted in clinical practice. More recently, microfragmented adipose tissue (MFAT) has been proposed as a more suitable solution. However, there is still no high-level evidence demonstrating the superiority of MFAT to BMAC. The aim of this randomised controlled trial is to compare the safety and clinical outcomes of a single intra-articular injection of BMAC versus a single intra-articular injection of MFAT in patients with knee OA. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: 204 patients aged 40-75 years and affected by knee OA are randomised to receive a single injection of BMAC or MFAT in a 1:1 ratio. The primary outcome of the study is the Western Ontario and McMaster University OA index (WOMAC) pain score at 6 months. The secondary outcomes of the study are the WOMAC pain score at 2 months and 12 months and the WOMAC subscales, the total WOMAC score, the International Knee Documentation Committee subjective and objective scores, the Knee Injury and OA Outcome score, the visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain evaluation, the EuroQol VAS and the Tegner score at 2 months, 6 months and 12 months. Moreover, the study aims at demonstrating whether these products have disease-modifying effects: radiographs and magnetic resonance evaluations are performed at baseline and at 12 months of follow-up, while systemic OA biomarkers are evaluated at baseline and after 2 months, 6 months and 12 months. As a tertiary outcome, this study aims at identifying the factors that influence the clinical response, including baseline patient clinical characteristics, biological features of the OA joint, as well as anabolic and anti-inflammatory properties of the injected products. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol has been approved by Emilia Romagna's Ethics Committee Comitato Etico Area Vasta Emilia Centro (CE-AVEC), Bologna, Italy (protocol number: 150/2023/Sper/IOR). Written informed consent is obtained from all participants. The findings of this study will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. PROTOCOL VERSION: March 2023. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06040957.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.