Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306984›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Learning about Inclusion Health in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review.

Gemma Ashwell, Amy M Russell, Andrea E Williamson, Lindsey M Pope

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Gemma AshwellFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK g.k.ashwell@leeds.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8617-0921
Amy M RussellFaculty of Medicine and Health, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
Andrea E WilliamsonSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8981-9068
Lindsey M PopeSchool of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0899-9616

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesAn Inclusion Health movement has gained momentum over the past decade, aiming to address the extreme health inequities faced by socially excluded groups (including people experiencing homelessness, problem substance use, Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities, vulnerable migrants, sex workers, people in contact with the justice system and victims of modern slavery). Despite this progress, there is a lack of understanding of how the issues are being taught by medical schools. We conducted a scoping review to identify and analyse existing research about Inclusion Health content and pedagogy in undergraduate medical education.

designA stepwise scoping review methodology was followed in accordance with the latest manual for evidence synthesis from Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. DATA SOURCES: A search was undertaken across six bibliographic databases, and additional articles were found through citation and grey literature searching. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary research studies and evidence reviews from 2013 onwards were included. There were no restrictions on language. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Standardised methods were used to screen possible papers. A charting table was developed to record key information from the 74 papers included. Quantitative steps of the analysis included frequency counts of the extent, nature and distribution of the studies; this was followed by basic qualitative content analysis.

resultsMost educational interventions were optional, or student led, with no longitudinal integration across curricula. There was little evidence of co-production with people with lived experience. Challenges included limited curricula time and faculty expertise, being an emotionally challenging subject, limitations of the biomedical model and informal learning perpetuating stigma. Key enablers included structured reflection, support, positive role models, interaction and co-production with people with lived experience, community partnerships and faculty commitment.

conclusionsDevelopments in undergraduate medical education are required to produce doctors equipped to meet the needs of socially excluded groups. We have summarised key aspects of the literature that will be useful to clinicians and educators in this endeavour. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: A review protocol was preregistered in the Open Science Framework on 11 May 2023 and can be accessed at https://osf.io/6c2rk/.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateCurriculumHumansEducation, MedicalHealthHealth EquitySystematic Review

Identifiers

PMID40306984
PMCPMC12049974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.