ArticleBMJ open2025
Learning about Inclusion Health in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Amplifying Marginalised Voices Through Advocacy: Community-Informed Curriculum Development for Cultural Safety in Homeless Health.The clinical teacher · 2026Article
- CBE and the Missing 'E': Making Competency-Based Education an Equitable Framework for Global Health Professions Education.Perspectives on medical education · 2026Article
- Are we researching the right questions? Bibliometric analysis of undergraduate nursing thesis alignment with Peru's health priorities.Frontiers in research metrics and analytics · 2026Article
- Learning about Inclusion Health in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review.BMJ open · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesAn Inclusion Health movement has gained momentum over the past decade, aiming to address the extreme health inequities faced by socially excluded groups (including people experiencing homelessness, problem substance use, Gypsy, Roma and Traveller communities, vulnerable migrants, sex workers, people in contact with the justice system and victims of modern slavery). Despite this progress, there is a lack of understanding of how the issues are being taught by medical schools. We conducted a scoping review to identify and analyse existing research about Inclusion Health content and pedagogy in undergraduate medical education.
designA stepwise scoping review methodology was followed in accordance with the latest manual for evidence synthesis from Joanna Briggs Institute and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. DATA SOURCES: A search was undertaken across six bibliographic databases, and additional articles were found through citation and grey literature searching. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: Primary research studies and evidence reviews from 2013 onwards were included. There were no restrictions on language. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS: Standardised methods were used to screen possible papers. A charting table was developed to record key information from the 74 papers included. Quantitative steps of the analysis included frequency counts of the extent, nature and distribution of the studies; this was followed by basic qualitative content analysis.
resultsMost educational interventions were optional, or student led, with no longitudinal integration across curricula. There was little evidence of co-production with people with lived experience. Challenges included limited curricula time and faculty expertise, being an emotionally challenging subject, limitations of the biomedical model and informal learning perpetuating stigma. Key enablers included structured reflection, support, positive role models, interaction and co-production with people with lived experience, community partnerships and faculty commitment.
conclusionsDevelopments in undergraduate medical education are required to produce doctors equipped to meet the needs of socially excluded groups. We have summarised key aspects of the literature that will be useful to clinicians and educators in this endeavour. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: A review protocol was preregistered in the Open Science Framework on 11 May 2023 and can be accessed at https://osf.io/6c2rk/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.