ArticleBMJ open2025
Methenamine hippurate for the management and prophylaxis of recurrent urinary tract infections: a scoping review protocol.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Urinary tract infections in immunocompromised patients.Current opinion in infectious diseases · 2025Review
- The interplay between chronic kidney disease and urinary tract infections: a comprehensive review on the pathophysiological insights, interconnected burdens, and prevention strategies.Therapeutic advances in infectious diseaseReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionRecurrent urinary tract infections (rUTIs) are typically treated using antibiotics. Given the growing issue of antimicrobial resistance, non-antibiotic management options for rUTIs have faced a recent resurgence in popularity. Methenamine hippurate is a urinary antiseptic used as a non-antibiotic prophylactic measure in those with rUTIs. The results of a recent randomised controlled trial showed methenamine hippurate to perform on par with antibiotic prophylaxis in adult women with rUTIs. However, little is known about the efficacy of methenamine hippurate in vulnerable patient populations, such as children, the elderly, patients with indwelling catheters and those with renal tract abnormalities. Moreover, an up-to-date, comprehensive evaluation of the entirety of the literature surrounding methenamine hippurate has yet to be carried out. As such, key trends within the literature, such as common side effects and specific avenues for future research, are difficult to determine. Therefore, we developed the methodology for a scoping review to map the entirety of the existing evidence base for methenamine hippurate. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The protocol for this scoping review was developed in accordance with the framework set out by Arksey and O'Malley. We will search MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ProQuest Dissertation and Theses from inception until August 2024, with no language restrictions applied. Studies including patients of any age and sex receiving methenamine hippurate treatment, either as a primary or adjunct treatment for rUTIs, will be eligible for inclusion. Interventional studies, such as randomised controlled trials and their protocols, non-randomised clinical trials, cohort studies, case-control studies and observational studies of any design, will be included. Grey literature, systematic reviews and qualitative studies will also be included. Two independent reviewers blinded to each other's decisions will assess the eligibility of articles at each stage using the Covidence review platform. After the relevant data from each study has been extracted, we will report the results of our scoping review using descriptive summary statistics and a narrative thematic analysis. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Due to the nature of the present study, ethical approval was not required for this scoping review. The final manuscript of this scoping review will be published in an international, peer-reviewed journal and the findings of the review presented in relevant national and international conferences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.