Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306961›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Cerebellar Activity Affects Distal Cortical Physiology and Synaptic Plasticity in a Human Parietal-Motor Pathway Associated with Motor Actions.

Elana R Goldenkoff, James A Brissenden, Taraz G Lee, Katherine J Michon, Michael Vesia

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Elana R GoldenkoffSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104.
James A BrissendenDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104.ORCID 0000-0002-2845-3728
Taraz G LeeDepartment of Psychology, University of Michigan, Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104.ORCID 0000-0002-3186-8625
Katherine J MichonSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104.
Michael VesiaSchool of Kinesiology, University of Michigan, Michigan, Ann Arbor 48104 mvesia@umich.edu.

Funding

Upgrade for MRI Instrument for Functional Brain ImagingS10OD026738 · OD · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI NOLL, DOUGLAS C · 2019 to 2019
$1.8M
Leveraging behavioral state to enhance specificity of non-invasive brain stimulation on motor circuitsR21NS118055 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI VESIA, MICHAEL · 2021 to 2021
$429k
Causal Role of Cortico-Cerebellar Networks in Working Memory (Childcare Supplement)F32MH124268 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI BRISSENDEN, JAMES ASHE · 2021 to 2023
$213k
NIH HHS S10 OD026738NIMH NIH HHS F32 MH124268NINDS NIH HHS R21 NS118055
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Voluntary movement control depends on plasticity in several interconnected brain regions, including the cerebellum (CB), primary motor cortex (M1), and posterior parietal cortex (PPC). It is thought that one role of the CB is to regulate communication between PPC and M1, but causal evidence for this regulatory role in humans remains lacking. Here, we evaluated how transiently altering activity in CB via intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) affects PPC-M1 connectivity and plasticity by assessing the effectiveness of subsequent Hebbian-like cortical paired associative stimulation (cPAS) to PPC and M1. Using a within-subject design, we administered four different single-session stimulation conditions to the CB and parietal-motor pathway of the motor network and measured the aftereffects on plasticity (both sexes). We administered iTBS to the right CB or right visual cortex, followed by cPAS of a parietal-motor circuit in the left hemisphere. In a subset of participants, we performed two additional control conditions to assess the effect of CB iTBS alone and Hebbian-like cPAS of the PPC-M1 circuit alone. We evaluated motor-evoked potentials (MEPs) using single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation as a measure of motor cortical excitability before and after each plasticity induction protocol. Cerebellar iTBS reduced cPAS-induced plasticity in the parietal-motor circuit, as evidenced by a decrease in MEPs. These responses were selective, as no decreases in excitability were observed during the control experiments. These findings suggest that CB activity can modify distal neural activity in a network-connected parietal-motor circuit through heterosynaptic metaplasticity.

Indexed as

CerebellumMotor ActivityMotor CortexNeuronal PlasticityParietal LobeAdultElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansMaleMovementNeural PathwaysTranscranial Magnetic StimulationYoung Adultactionexcitabilitymotor cortexparietal cortexplasticityTMS

Identifiers

PMID40306961
PMCPMC12139593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.