Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306960›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience2025

Whole-Brain Dimensions of Intrinsic Connectivity Capture Modality-Specific and Heteromodal Language Representations.

Lidon Marin-Marin, Susanne Eisenhauer, Tirso R J Gonzalez Alam, Daniel S Margulies, Jonathan Smallwood, Elizabeth Jefferies

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Lidon Marin-MarinDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5NA, United Kingdom lidon.marinmarin@york.ac.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-2036-762X
Susanne EisenhauerDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5NA, United Kingdom.
Tirso R J Gonzalez AlamSchool of Psychology, Bangor University, Bangor LL57 2AS, United Kingdom.
Daniel S MarguliesCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), Université de Paris, Paris 75016, France.
Jonathan SmallwoodDepartment of Psychology, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario K7L 3N6, Canada.
Elizabeth JefferiesDepartment of Psychology, University of York, York YO10 5NA, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-3826-4330

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Comprehension of spoken and written language involves a hierarchical sequence of modality-specific and heteromodal processes. While these have been localized to different regions, modality-selective responses extend beyond them, implicating large-scale network organization in language comprehension. Dimensions of whole-brain connectivity, derived from intrinsic activity, have been proposed as a general organizing framework for cognition. Here, we test their utility in accounting for the spatial distribution of task-evoked activity during language comprehension. We investigated brain activity in human males and females in response to psycholinguistic variables linked to input processing and meaning in a sentence comprehension task presented both visually and auditorily. Macroscale patterns of brain activity were similar across modalities for sentence-level and semantic variables, but effects of orthographic and phonological distance were negatively correlated between modalities. The first dimension, separating heteromodal and unimodal cortices, showed no differences across modalities for sentence processing and semantic variables and opposite effects of word length and orthographic/phonological distance for spoken and written words, supporting the notion that higher-order processing requires heteromodal resources different to those linked to input processing. The second dimension, separating auditory-motor and visual processes, showed an asymmetry in the recruitment of the unimodal systems-listening to long and semantically dissimilar words involved stronger recruitment of primary auditory-motor regions and low visual engagement. These findings show that the language system is organized according to large-scale axes of intrinsic connectivity, with psycholinguistic processes varying systematically along whole-brain dimensions. This supports the view that language comprehension reflects general principles of cortical organization.

Indexed as

BrainBrain MappingComprehensionLanguageNerve NetSpeech PerceptionAcoustic StimulationAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeural PathwaysPhotic StimulationPsycholinguisticsSemanticsauditoryconnectivityconnectivity dimensionslanguage comprehensionvisualwhole-brain activity

Identifiers

PMID40306960
PMCPMC12121703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.