Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306955›Full record

SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2025

Biomarkers in lower respiratory tract samples in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review.

Emily Gromelsky Ljungcrantz, Sanna Askman, Fredrik Sjövall, Magnus Paulsson

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily Gromelsky LjungcrantzInfection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Sanna AskmanInfection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Fredrik SjövallMitochondrial Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Faculty of Medicine, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Magnus PaulssonInfection Medicine, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Medical Faculty, Lund University, Lund, Sweden magnus.paulsson@med.lu.se.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common intensive care unit-acquired infection, yet its diagnosis is complicated by the lack of reliable diagnostic criteria and validated biomarkers. Due to the compartmentalisation of the immune response, host proteins in respiratory tract samples are more likely than serum proteins to accurately identify VAP. However, a reliable biomarker is still missing and it is generally agreed that >90% sensitivity and specificity are required for the introduction of a VAP biomarker into clinical routine.

methodsA structured database search was performed to identify publications aimed at deriving or verifying human respiratory tract VAP biomarkers. The results were screened by two independent reviewers and summarised using statistical and narrative synthesis.

results40 articles were identified, focusing on 29 unique biomarkers with clinical and microbiological diagnoses of VAP as the reference standard. The most frequently studied biomarker was soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 1 (sTREM-1) (n=16), followed by various interleukins (n=7), neutrophil-related proteins (n=8) and amylase as a surrogate for microaspiration (n=4). The target accuracy of >90% specificity and sensitivity for VAP was reported in four publications on sTREM-1, one on pentraxin-3 (PTX3) and one on heparin-binding protein (HBP). Meta-analysis of sTREM-1 resulted in a sensitivity of 78% (95% CI 61-89%) and specificity of 76% (95% CI 49-91%). DISCUSSION: This systematic review found that no biomarker can currently be recommended for clinical use due to performance below 90% specificity or sensitivity, or insufficient data (PTX3 and HBP). Accurate clinical phenotyping into VAP subcategories may enable the discovery of VAP biomarkers with higher accuracy.

Indexed as

Pneumonia, Ventilator-AssociatedBiomarkersHumansPredictive Value of TestsReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkers

Identifiers

PMID40306955
PMCPMC12041932

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.