SynthesisEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2025
Biomarkers in lower respiratory tract samples in the diagnosis of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a systematic review.
Synthesis in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Challenges and opportunities in the management of severe pneumonia. Key concepts from the Seventh Annual Meeting of Spanish Experts 2025.Revista espanola de quimioterapia : publicacion oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Quimioterapia · 2026Review
- ClusterVAP: study protocol for multicentre proteomic endotyping of ventilator-associated pneumonia.BMJ open respiratory research · 2026Article
- Evaluation of a Particle Enhanced Turbidimetric Immunoassay (PETIA) for detecting calprotectin in sputum samples.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2026Article
- Airway tracers and biomarkers for aspiration detection and VAP prediction in ICU patients with tracheal tubes: a systematic review and diagnostic accuracy meta-analysis.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Immune imbalance markers: key factors in early recognition of multidrug-resistant bacterial infections in non-immunocompromised VAP patients.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- NanoArrayPAD-X: Nanoprobe Array and 3D-µPAD for the Simultaneous Detection of Respiratory Pathogens and Biomarkers at the Point of Care.Biosensors · 2025Article
- Nosocomial and Ventilator-associated Pneumonia.Open respiratory archivesReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundVentilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is the most common intensive care unit-acquired infection, yet its diagnosis is complicated by the lack of reliable diagnostic criteria and validated biomarkers. Due to the compartmentalisation of the immune response, host proteins in respiratory tract samples are more likely than serum proteins to accurately identify VAP. However, a reliable biomarker is still missing and it is generally agreed that >90% sensitivity and specificity are required for the introduction of a VAP biomarker into clinical routine.
methodsA structured database search was performed to identify publications aimed at deriving or verifying human respiratory tract VAP biomarkers. The results were screened by two independent reviewers and summarised using statistical and narrative synthesis.
results40 articles were identified, focusing on 29 unique biomarkers with clinical and microbiological diagnoses of VAP as the reference standard. The most frequently studied biomarker was soluble triggering receptor expressed on myeloid cell 1 (sTREM-1) (n=16), followed by various interleukins (n=7), neutrophil-related proteins (n=8) and amylase as a surrogate for microaspiration (n=4). The target accuracy of >90% specificity and sensitivity for VAP was reported in four publications on sTREM-1, one on pentraxin-3 (PTX3) and one on heparin-binding protein (HBP). Meta-analysis of sTREM-1 resulted in a sensitivity of 78% (95% CI 61-89%) and specificity of 76% (95% CI 49-91%). DISCUSSION: This systematic review found that no biomarker can currently be recommended for clinical use due to performance below 90% specificity or sensitivity, or insufficient data (PTX3 and HBP). Accurate clinical phenotyping into VAP subcategories may enable the discovery of VAP biomarkers with higher accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.