Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306922›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Quantifying, Understanding and Enhancing Relational Continuity of Care (QUERCC): a mixed-methods protocol.

Tom Marshall, Fiona Scheibl, Iestyn Williams, Krishnarajah Nirantharakumar, Brian H Willis, Panagiotis Kasteridis, Kamil Sterniczuk, Jinyang Chen, Zecharias Fetene Anteneh, Sheila Greenfield

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. What do patients and clinicians think about continuity in general practice in England? a qualitative study.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Tom MarshallSchool of Health Sciences, Public Health and Epidemiology, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK t.p.marshall@bham.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9277-5214
Fiona ScheiblSchool of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9115-1247
Iestyn WilliamsSchool of Social Policy, College of Social Sciences, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9462-9488
Krishnarajah NirantharakumarSchool of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6816-1279
Brian H WillisSchool of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0821-8624
Panagiotis KasteridisCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1623-4293
Kamil SterniczukSchool of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.
Jinyang ChenCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2994-3470
Zecharias Fetene AntenehCentre for Health Economics, University of York, York, Yorkshire, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6588-9056
Sheila GreenfieldSchool of Health Sciences, College of Medicine and Health, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8796-4114

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRelational continuity of care is where patients see the same clinicians over time. Evidence suggests relational continuity of care is valued by patients and clinicians and results in better health. While current National Health Service policy aims to maintain relational continuity of care, it has been declining in recent years, which may be linked to the growth in practice size, increased staff turnover, part-time working and the focus on patient access. Our research aims to develop resources to help clinicians measure, manage and improve relational continuity of care. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: A mixed-methods approach in UK primary care commencing with two workshops drawing patients, clinicians and researchers together to establish an agreed approach on the measurement of continuity of care. Second, analysis of national data will provide insight into how staff turnover, part time working, practice size and funding per patient affects continuity. Third, case studies in a sample of high-performing practices will document the barriers and facilitators to the establishment and maintenance of continuity of care. Fourth, an economic analysis of resource costs and health outcomes using linked primary and secondary care data will show whether costs influence continuity for different patient groups (by age, sex, deprivation status and chronic disease status). Fifth, we will develop practical guidance for clinicians to improve continuity of care, based on the findings from each stage of the research. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has approval from HRA Health and Care Research Wales Research Ethics Committee (HCRW). Findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications, participatory workshops, podcasts, clinical networks and academic conferences.

Indexed as

Continuity of Patient CarePrimary Health CareHumansResearch DesignState MedicineUnited KingdomHEALTH ECONOMICSPatient Care ManagementPerson-Centered CareQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID40306922
PMCPMC12049910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.