ArticleBMJ open2025
To prescribe or not to prescribe in the elderly: a qualitative exploration of prescribing dilemmas among Pakistani healthcare providers.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivePotentially inappropriate prescribing is a global health issue with catastrophic consequences in the elderly population. Healthcare providers play a critical role in medication optimisation in elderly patients. The present study aims to explore the perceptions of healthcare professionals (prescribers) regarding the complexities of inappropriate prescribing practices in the elderly population.
designA qualitative study using semistructured interviews was conducted. All the data were transcribed verbatim and analysed via Braun and Clarke's thematic analysis approach.
settingPrescribers working in a tertiary care hospital in Karachi, Pakistan.
participantsPrescribers having more than 5 years of experience in elderly prescribing. Participants were selected using purposive sampling, and recruitment continued until the point of data saturation, meaning no new major themes emerged.
results13 prescribers, five females and eight males with an average experience of 15.3 years, were interviewed. The interviews lasted for an average of 15 min. The analysis revealed three primary themes: (1) inappropriate prescribing, characterised by knowledge and awareness of inappropriate prescribing and its assessment tools; (2) complexities in elderly prescribing, highlighting patient factors such as comorbidities, polypharmacy, psychological issues and socioeconomic challenges, as well as prescriber factors; and (3) interventions to improve prescribing, emphasising the role of pharmacists in enhancing medication safety, the importance of effective patient-prescriber relationships through counselling and the need for regulatory measures to monitor prescribing behaviours. Inadequate knowledge of standardised assessment tools such as the Screening Tool to Alert to Right Treatment/Screening Tool of Older Persons' Prescriptions criteria, time constraints faced by prescribers and fragmented healthcare systems were some of the barriers identified by the respondents in medication optimisation for elderly individuals.
conclusionThe findings highlight the need for enhanced education on standardised assessment tools and the implementation of targeted interventions. A key recommendation is the integration of clinical pharmacists into care teams to optimise prescribing practices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.