Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306674›Full record

ArticleApplied clinical informatics2025

The Honest Enterprise Research Broker: Facilitating Ethical, Efficient, and Secure Access to Health Data for Research.

Michelle S Keller, Pamela Roberts, Kevin Japardi, Joseph E Ebinger, Tod Davis, Joshua Pevnick, Sivathmika Chevvuri, Hudson Stuck, Shao-Chi Huang, Edward Kowalewski and 4 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied clinical informatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Michelle S KellerDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Pamela RobertsDivision of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Kevin JapardiResearch Data Intelligence, Enterprise Information Systems, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Joseph E EbingerDepartment of Cardiology, Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Tod DavisResearch Data Intelligence, Enterprise Information Systems, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Joshua PevnickDivision of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Sivathmika ChevvuriResearch Data Intelligence, Enterprise Information Systems, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Hudson StuckResearch Data Intelligence, Enterprise Information Systems, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Shao-Chi HuangResearch Data Intelligence, Enterprise Information Systems, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Edward KowalewskiResearch Data Intelligence, Enterprise Information Systems, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Ashley LinResearch Data Intelligence, Enterprise Information Systems, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Andrew SanapanyaResearch Data Intelligence, Enterprise Information Systems, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Alan TominesResearch Data Intelligence, Enterprise Information Systems, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.
Spencer SooHooDivision of Informatics, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, United States.

Funding

UCLA Clinical Translational Science InstituteUL1TR001881 · NCATS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI ARLEEN F. BROWN, ARASH NAEIM · 2016 to 2026
$118.1M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1TR001881NIH HHS UL1TR001881U.S. Department of Health and Human Services UL1TR001881
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHealth systems generate and store vast amounts of clinical data, requiring structured processes to ensure that secondary use of the data is available to researchers in an efficient, ethical, and secure manner.

objectiveWe describe a process to provide data to health system researchers at a large, multi-hospital health system that balances efficiency with security and ethics.

methodsThe Honest Enterprise Research Broker (HERB) Committee has enacted a systematic process to deliver investigators requesting data, using pre-written SQL code, when possible, to increase efficiency, providing a suite of self-service tools for cohort size estimation, and assessing the security and privacy of data leaving the institution. We evaluated the number of extracts per year, the average time to delivery of the data extract, and user satisfaction with the process.

resultsFrom 2018 to 2023, the HERB Committee completed 487 data extracts. The number of requests increased from 51 in 2018 to 121 in 2023. Even as the number of extracts increased, the number of hours per extract decreased from 12.5 in 2018 to 9 in 2023. User satisfaction surveys found a high degree of satisfaction with the process.

conclusionThrough a process of continuous improvement, the HERB Committee has developed an expedient process to support the research needs of a large academic multi-hospital health system.

Indexed as

Access to InformationBiomedical ResearchComputer SecurityConfidentialityHumans

Identifiers

PMID40306674
PMCPMC12043374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.