ArticleBone & joint open2025
Primary total hip arthroplasty using custom-made acetabular implants in patients with high hip dislocation : surgical technique and results.
Article in Bone & joint open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Pooled it
- Article
- Severity-dependent benefits of AI-assisted 3D planning in total hip arthroplasty: a Crowe I-IV subgroup and trend analysis.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
- Custom-made acetabular implants for revision total hip arthroplasty: postoperative evaluation of the accuracy of implant positioning.BMC musculoskeletal disorders · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aims: Despite good results of using uncemented press-fit cups in patients with high hip dislocations (type C as per the Hartofilakidis classification), there are reports of loosening of these components. To improve the results on the acetabular side in patients with high hip dislocations, we used custom-made acetabular implants (CMAIs). The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) using CMAIs in patients with high hip dislocation. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the results of primary THA using the CMAIs in 58 hips (52 patients) from November 2017 to December 2019. All surgeries were performed using the femoral shortening osteotomy technique described by Paavilainen. Type C1 and C2 dislocations were observed in nine and 49 hips, respectively. The presence of various complications, functional results using the Oxford Hip Score (OHS), patient satisfaction, radiological parameters, and positioning of CMAIs were assessed. Results: The mean follow-up period, including radiological follow-up for all 58 hips, was 5.2 years (4.2 to 6.3; SD 0.71). Patients demonstrated statistically significant improved functional outcomes according to the OHS (preoperatively 16.9 and postoperatively 38.5; p < 0.001). Four hips were revised: two hips due to dislocations, the cause of which was impingement of the greater trochanter due to malposition of the distally advanced greater trochanter after osteotomy. One hip was due to nonunion of the distally advanced greater trochanter after osteotomy, and one hip due to pain resulting from iliopsoas impingement caused by contact of the CMAI flange with the iliopsoas muscle. There were no radiological signs of loosening of the CMAIs. Any deviation of the CMAIs from the planned position was noted. Conclusion: This preliminary study demonstrated that CMAIs may offer good bone fixation in patients with high hip dislocation; however, further biomechanical studies are needed to evaluate the use of CMAIs in terms of osseointegration, additional screw fixation, and to determine the effect of deviation of CMAIs from the planned position on clinically relevant complications.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.