Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306645›Full record

ArticleJMIR pediatrics and parenting2025

Augmenting Parenting Programs With the Pause Mobile App: Mixed Methods Evaluation.

Nathan Hodson, Peter Ivor Woods, Stephanie Donohoe, Juan Luque Solano, James Gardner, Manuel Giardino, Michael Sobolev, Domenico Giacco

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR pediatrics and parenting, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nathan HodsonWarwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6022-2260
Peter Ivor WoodsUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0910-8291
Stephanie DonohoeUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0007-6764-6008
Juan Luque SolanoUniversity of Buckingham, Buckingham, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5033-5825
James GardnerCoventry and Warwickshire Partnership NHS Trust, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0001-3807-5724
Manuel GiardinoUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0006-7477-9004
Michael SobolevCedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8931-7682
Domenico GiaccoUniversity of Warwick, Coventry, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7809-8800

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundParenting programs are the recommended treatment for common mental health problems of childhood such as conduct disorder. In the United Kingdom, local authorities have responsibility for providing or commissioning these programs through face-to-face and video call weekly groups and e-learning style asynchronous offerings. However, there has been a shortage of research into the potential of digital resources to augment and enhance parenting groups.

objectiveThis pilot study aimed to explore whether providing digital microinterventions in a mobile app (Pause) to augment parenting programs is a feasible strategy. Pause fits into parenting programs and prompts and supports parents to use each week's new parenting skill at home. Specifically, we want to understand (1) whether parents use Pause, (2) what type of features or tools in Pause are most frequently used for support, and (3) what are the perceived strengths and weaknesses of Pause.

methodsPause was provided to parents attending 3 of the most common parenting programs delivered across 3 local authorities in the United Kingdom. During weekly sessions, parents were supported to add "tools" in the app, which mapped onto the training in their session, for example, distracting their child, setting age-appropriate consequences, and using praise. Preprogram surveys were obtained at the first session. After programs were completed, postprogram surveys were administered to measure app use, gather which tools parents used, and explore the strengths and weaknesses of the app. Participants and practitioners were invited for interviews, where the strengths and weaknesses of augmenting parenting programs with Pause were discussed in more detail.

resultsIn total, 53 parents were recruited from groups. A total of 25 of 53 (47%) parents completed postsurveys distributed at their final parenting group session, in keeping with typical rates of attrition in parenting programs. In addition, 7 parents and 3 practitioners agreed to interviews after the program. Most of the parents (23/25, 92%) had used Pause. Other than the journal, used by 17 parents, the most popular tools were the relax tool and praise tool, each used by 10 parents. Survey data revealed specific strengths and weaknesses of the tools in Pause, particularly highlighting that parents wanted Pause to provide more ideas for distraction or relaxation activities. Interviews revealed the challenges parents attending programs face, the range of family members using Pause, and the diverse settings where it was used. Interviews also revealed specific opportunities for improving the user interface and for addressing challenges in the journaling function.

conclusionsThis pilot study found good acceptability and engagement with Pause. Interviews revealed promising evidence, suggesting that Pause may improve family life and aid child behavior change. Future research should evaluate whether adding Pause to parenting programs increases their positive effects on children's behavior and mental health.

Indexed as

children’s mental healthdigital microinterventionlocal authorityparentingparenting app

Identifiers

PMID40306645
PMCPMC12079061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.