Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306640›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of perinatology2025

FGR Diagnosis with EFW <10% versus AC <10%: Differences in Clinical Presentation, Pregnancy Outcomes, and Correlation with Placental Lesions of Malperfusion.

Megan Savage, Luiza Perez, Natalie Nguyen, Stephen Chasen

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of perinatology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Megan SavageDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Lenox Hill Hospital, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, New York, New York.
Luiza PerezDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Natalie NguyenDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Stephen ChasenDivision of Maternal Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study aimed to identify what biometry is most predictive of placental malperfusion and obstetrical outcomes.Retrospective cohort study comparing pregnancies diagnosed with fetal growth restriction (FGR) from 2018 to 2020. Pregnancies with estimated fetal weight (EFW) < 10th percentile were characterized as the "EFW" group, and those with normal EFW but abdominal circumference (AC) < 10th percentile were characterized as the "AC" group. Mann-Whitney U, Fisher's exact test, and chi-square were used for statistical comparison.A total of 318 pregnancies were included, with 250 and 68 in EFW and AC groups, respectively. There were no significant differences in demographics between groups. The diagnosis was earlier in the EFW group (33 [30-36] vs. 35 [32-36] weeks;

Indexed as

Fetal Growth RetardationFetal WeightPlacentaAdultFemaleGestational AgeHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesUltrasonography, Prenatal

Identifiers

PMID40306640
PMCPMC12623115

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.