Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306631›Full record

ArticleJMIR serious games2025

Immersive Virtual Reality and AI (Generative Pretrained Transformer) to Enhance Student Preparedness for Objective Structured Clinical Examinations: Mixed Methods Study.

Shaniff Esmail, Brendan Concannon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR serious games, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Shaniff Esmail *Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0372-3311
Brendan Concannon *Department of Occupational Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5371-3774

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundImmersive virtual reality (VR) and artificial intelligence have been used to determine whether a simulated clinical exam setting can reduce anxiety in first-year occupational therapy students preparing for objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs). Test anxiety is common among postsecondary students, leading to negative outcomes such as increased dropout risk, lower grades, and limited employment opportunities. Students unfamiliar with specific testing environments are particularly prone to anxiety. VR simulations of OSCEs may allow students to become familiar with the exam setting and reduce anxiety.

objectiveThis study aimed to assess the efficacy of a VR simulation depicting clinical settings to reduce student anxiety about a clinical exam while gathering perspectives on their first-year coursework experiences to better understand their learning environment.

methodsAn experimental, nonrandomized controlled trial compared state anxiety, trait test anxiety, and OSCE grades in 2 groups of first-year occupational therapy students analyzed using independent t tests (2-tailed). Group 1 (NoVR) was not exposed to the VR simulation and acted as a control group for group 2 (YesVR), who were exposed to the VR simulation. The VR used artificial intelligence in the form of a generative pretrained transformer to generate responses from virtual patients as students interacted with them in natural language. Self-reported psychometric scales measured anxiety levels 3 days before the OSCE. YesVR students completed perceived preparation surveys at 2 time points-3 weeks and 3 days before the OSCE-analyzed using dependent t tests. Semistructured interviews and focus groups were conducted within 1 week after the OSCE. Student perspectives on their classes and VR experiences were summarized using interpretative thematic analysis.

resultsIn total, 60 students-32 (53%) in the NoVR group and 28 (47%) in the YesVR group-participated in the study, and the YesVR group showed a significant reduction in state anxiety (t

conclusionsIntolerance of uncertainty may lead students to interpret ambiguous exam situations as overly precarious. Findings suggest that VR simulation was associated with reduced state anxiety, although results from this small, nonrandomized sample should be interpreted cautiously. Qualitative data indicated that VR helped students gain familiarity with clinical exam settings, potentially decreasing uncertainty-based anxiety. Future research with larger or randomized samples is needed to confirm these findings and explore advanced VR tools offering feedback to enhance learning.

Indexed as

anxietyartificial intelligencegenerative pretrained transformerhead-mounted displayimmersive technologyobjective structured clinical examinationoccupational therapypsychologysimulationvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID40306631
PMCPMC12079070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.