ArticleGesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany))2025
[Participatory development of practice guidelines for consistency in pandemic management approaches across local health authorities in Germany: results of a workshop based on semi-structured interviews].
Article in Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- [Work-organizational Strategies and Measures for Pandemic Management in Inpatient Care: Findings from Scenario Workshops].Gesundheitswesen (Bundesverband der Arzte des Offentlichen Gesundheitsdienstes (Germany)) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with major challenges for the public health service in Germany including the need to adapt structures and management processes in local health authorities under time pressure. Comprehensively analyzing challenges based on the perspectives of public health service staff and developing practice guidelines could contribute to the long-term strengthening of the public health service in Germany. The present project utilized qualitative methods to capture experiences in pandemic management and, collaboratively with public health service staff, developed practice guidelines for establishing consistency in pandemic management approaches across local health authorities.Twenty-one semi-structured interviews were conducted with local health authority staff from Baden-Württemberg (BW), a federal state of Germany, on perceived barriers of and enabling factors for successful pandemic management (09/21-02/22). Interviews were analyzed using thematic content analysis. Fields of action emerging from the interviews were prioritized in bilateral discussions with eight representatives from local health authorities (05/22-06/22). For the prioritized field of action, a workshop was held with 16 participants from 11 local health authorities and the Ministry of Social Affairs, Health and Integration BW (SM BW) to develop practice guidelines (06/22).Qualitative content analyses revealed 22 fields of action to strengthen pandemic management.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.