Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40306616›Full record

ArticleBrain stimulation

Phase-dependent closed-loop deep brain stimulation of the fornix provides bidirectional manipulation of hippocampal theta oscillations.

Isaac Grennan, Brook Perry, Anna Verghese, Melissa Jones, Oliver Härmson, Colin G McNamara, Andrew Sharott

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain stimulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Interneuron theta phase locking controls seizure susceptibility.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isaac GrennanMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: isaac.grennan@bndu.ox.ac.uk.
Brook PerryMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Anna VergheseMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Melissa JonesMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Oliver HärmsonMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Colin G McNamaraMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom; Department of Physiology, School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Health, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland; APC Microbiome Ireland, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland.
Andrew SharottMedical Research Council Brain Network Dynamics Unit, Nuffield Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. Electronic address: andrew.sharott@bndu.ox.ac.uk.

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00003/6Wellcome Trust 209120
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlzheimer's disease (AD) has very limited treatment options and therapies to prevent or reverse neurodegeneration remain elusive. Deep brain stimulation (DBS), whereby high-frequency pulses of electricity are delivered continuously to a specific part of the brain, has been trialled as an experimental treatment for AD. In AD patients, continuous, high frequency DBS targeted to the fornix (fx-DBS) has been shown to be safe, but not reliably effective across patients. In movement disorders, high-frequency DBS is thought to act as a virtual lesion, disrupting pathophysiological activity. In AD, it may be more advantageous to use stimulation to reinforce or rebuild oscillatory activities that are disrupted by the disease process. A primary candidate for such a target is the hippocampal theta oscillation, which provides a temporal framework for mnemonic processing and is altered in rodent models of AD. MATERIAL AND

methodsWe applied closed-loop electrical stimulation to the fornix of rats traversing a linear track, triggered by different phases of the ongoing theta oscillation in the hippocampal local field potential (LFP) using the OscillTrack algorithm.

resultsStimulation at different target phases could robustly suppress or amplify the theta oscillation, and these effects were significantly larger than those caused by open-loop replay of the same stimulation pattern. Amplification of the theta oscillation could be achieved irrespective of the locomotor speed of the animal, showing that it did not result from a secondary effect of behavioural change.

conclusionsOur findings demonstrate that closed-loop fx-DBS is a viable method of modulating the amplitude of hippocampal theta oscillations that could be applied in human devices to provide a constructive intervention with the potential to boost memory circuit function in AD.

Indexed as

Deep Brain StimulationFornix, BrainHippocampusTheta RhythmAnimalsMaleRats

Identifiers

PMID40306616
PMCPMC7618027

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.