ArticleAmerican journal of human genetics2025
Mitochondrial DNA disease discovery through evaluation of genotype and phenotype data: The Solve-RD experience.
Article in American journal of human genetics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Whole genome sequencing in cerebral palsy: a UK paediatric pilot study.The Lancet regional health. Europe · 2026Article
- Advances in Primary Mitochondrial Diseases: Diagnosis, Natural History Studies and Clinical Trials.Genes · 2026Review
- Advancing the diagnosis of rare neuromuscular and neurological diseases through the collaborative Solve-RD research framework.Journal of neuromuscular diseases · 2026Review
- Mitochondrial Dysfunction: From Molecular Mechanisms to Modern Approaches for Basic and Clinical Research.Biomedicines · 2026Review
- A systematic analysis of mitochondrial aminoacyl tRNA synthetase variants in a rare disease cohort.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis of mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) diseases remains challenging with next-generation sequencing, where bioinformatic analysis is usually more focused on the nuclear genome. We developed a workflow for the evaluation of mtDNA diseases and applied it in a large European rare disease cohort (Solve-RD). A semi-automated bioinformatic pipeline with MToolBox was used to filter the unsolved Solve-RD cohort for rare mtDNA variants after validating this pipeline on exome datasets of 42 individuals previously diagnosed with mtDNA variants. Variants were filtered based on blood heteroplasmy levels (≥1%) and reported association with disease. Overall, 10,157 exome and genome datasets from 9,923 affected individuals from 9,483 families within Solve-RD met the quality inclusion criteria. 136 mtDNA variants in 135 undiagnosed individuals were prioritized using the filtering approach. A focused MitoPhen-based phenotype similarity scoring method was tested in a separate genetically diagnosed "phenotype test cohort" consisting of nuclear gene and mtDNA diseases using a receiving operator characteristic evaluation. We applied the MitoPhen-based phenotype similarity score of >0.3, which was highly sensitive for detecting mtDNA diseases in the phenotype test cohort, to the filtered cohort of 135 undiagnosed individuals. This aided the prioritization of 34 out of 37 (92%) individuals who received confirmed and likely causative mtDNA disease diagnoses. The phenotypic evaluation was limited by the quality of input data in some individuals. The overall pipeline led to an additional diagnostic yield of 0.4% in a cohort where mitochondrial disease was not initially suspected. This highlights the value of our mtDNA analysis pipeline in diverse datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.