ArticleJMIR aging2025
Using Machine Learning to Predict Cognitive Decline in Older Adults From the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey: Model Development and Validation Study.
Article in JMIR aging, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Multimodal AI for Alzheimer Disease Diagnosis: Systematic Review of Datasets, Models, and Modalities.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Pooled it
- Machine Learning for the Analysis of Healthy Lifestyle Data: Scoping Review and Guidelines.JMIR human factors · 2026Guideline
- Article
- Predicting mild cognitive impairment among rural older adults in China: development and validation of a risk prediction model.BMC geriatrics · 2026Article
- Machine learning for Alzheimer's disease progression under extreme class imbalance.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in the Management of Infectious Diseases in Older Adults: Diagnostic, Prognostic, and Therapeutic Applications.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Screening mild cognitive impairment using aspects of personal, social, and functional lifestyle: Machine Learning Approaches.PloS one · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cognitive impairment, indicative of Alzheimer disease and other forms of dementia, significantly deteriorates the quality of life of older adult populations and imposes considerable burdens on families and health care systems worldwide. The early identification of individuals at risk for cognitive impairment through a convenient and rapid method is crucial for the timely implementation of interventions. Objective: The objective of this study was to explore the application of machine learning (ML) to integrate blood biomarkers, life behaviors, and disease history to predict the decline in cognitive function. Methods: This approach uses data from the Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey. A total of 2688 participants aged 65 years or older from the 2008-2009, 2011-2012, and 2014 Chinese Longitudinal Healthy Longevity Survey waves were included, with cognitive impairment defined as a Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score below 18. The dataset was divided into a training set (n=1331), an internal test set (n=333), and a prospective validation set (n=1024). Participants with a baseline MMSE score of less than 18 were excluded from the cohort to ensure a more accurate assessment of cognitive function. We developed ML models that integrate demographic information, health behaviors, disease history, and blood biomarkers to predict cognitive function at the 3-year follow-up point, specifically identifying individuals who are at risk of experiencing significant declines in cognitive function by that time. Specifically, the models aimed to identify individuals who would experience a significant decline in their MMSE scores (less than 18) by the end of the follow-up period. The performance of these models was evaluated using metrics including accuracy, sensitivity, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: All ML models outperformed the MMSE alone. The balanced random forest achieved the highest accuracy (88.5% in the internal test set and 88.7% in the prospective validation set), albeit with a lower sensitivity, while logistic regression recorded the highest sensitivity. SHAP (Shapley Additive Explanations) analysis identified instrumental activities of daily living, age, and baseline MMSE scores as the most influential predictors for cognitive impairment. Conclusions: The incorporation of blood biomarkers, along with demographic, life behavior, and disease history into ML models offers a convenient, rapid, and accurate approach for the early identification of older adult individuals at risk of cognitive impairment. This method presents a valuable tool for health care professionals to facilitate timely interventions and underscores the importance of integrating diverse data types in predictive health models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.