ArticlePLOS global public health2025
Who has never tested for HIV following a community-based distribution of HIV self-test kits? Establishing associated predictors in rural Zimbabwe.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In 2023, Zimbabwe attained the 95-95-95 UNAIDS targets. However, some sub-populations are substantially less likely to have tested for HIV. Knowledge of characteristics of these groups is crucial in designing interventions that address their needs. We estimated the prevalence and predictors of "never-having tested for HIV" status following community-based distribution of HIV self-test kits in rural Zimbabwe. We analysed data from a household survey conducted as part of a cluster randomised trial comparing two community-based HIVST distribution models in six rural districts in 2018-19. HIVST distribution was conducted over one month, followed by the household survey after four months. Survey participants aged 16 years and above completed self-administered Audio-Computer-Assisted-Survey-Instrument. Unadjusted and adjusted mixed effect logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with never-having-tested for HIV. Of the 11,076 analysed participants, the median (IQR) age was 32(22,45) years and 54.5% were female. Seventeen percent of participants had never tested for HIV, primarily due to a perceived lack of HIV risk (50%). Never testers were more likely to be: men (adjusted odds ratio [AOR]=1.69;95%Confidence Interval [CI]=1.52-1.87); younger (16-24 years (AOR=3.84; 95%CI=3.23-4.55), 25-34 years (AOR=1.30; 95%CI=1.07-1.59)) and at-least 45 years old: (AOR=2.17; 95%CI=1.80-2.60); having lower levels of education: primary/less (AOR=1.68; 95%CI=1.46-1.98), some secondary (AOR=1.62; 95%CI=1.42-1.86) compared to at least complete secondary, unemployed (AOR=1.39; 95%CI=1.15-1.69); never married (AOR=3.48; 95%CI=2.98-4.07) and previously married (AOR=1.41; 95%CI=1.19-1.68) compared to currently married; having stigmatizing beliefs (AOR=1.42; 95%CI=1.24-1.62); having: low (AOR=1.52, 95%CI=1.32-1.74) and medium (OR=1.53, 95%CI=1.33-1.75) levels of treatment optimism; not participating in household decisions (AOR=1.96; 95%CI=1.70-2.27) and not reporting condomless sex (AOR=2.58; 95%CI=2.31-2.87). The Ministry of Health need to scale up acceptable and targeted interventions to improve HIV testing in different subpopulations which includes but not limited to young people, unmarried, unemployed, those with stigmatizing beliefs and those not participating in decision making.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.