Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305584›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2025

Foraging animals use dynamic Bayesian updating to model meta-uncertainty in environment representations.

James Webb, Paul Steffan, Benjamin Y Hayden, Daeyeol Lee, Caleb Kemere, Matthew McGinley

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

James WebbDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0003-0403-2168
Paul SteffanDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Benjamin Y HaydenDepartment of Neurosurgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Daeyeol LeeThe Zanvyl Krieger Mind/Brain Institute, The Solomon H Snyder Department of Neuroscience, Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Kavli Neuroscience Discovery Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Caleb KemereDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.
Matthew McGinleyDepartment of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas, United States of America.

Funding

Div Supp: Daniela del Rio Pulido CRCNS: Unsupervised Learning of Hippocampal Sequence Dynamic in SleepR01NS115233 · NINDS · RICE UNIVERSITY · PI DIBA, KAMRAN, KEMERE, CALEB · 2019 to 2023
$2.3M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS115233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Foraging theory predicts animal behavior in many contexts. In patch-based foraging behaviors, the marginal value theorem (MVT) gives the optimal strategy for deterministic environments whose parameters are fully known to the forager. In natural settings, environmental parameters exhibit variability and are only partially known to the animal based on its experience, creating uncertainty. Models of uncertainty in foraging are well established. However, natural environments also exhibit unpredicted changes in their statistics. As a result, animals must ascertain whether the currently observed quality of the environment is consistent with their internal models, or whether something has changed, creating meta-uncertainty. Behavioral strategies for optimizing foraging behavior under meta-uncertainty, and their neural underpinnings, are largely unknown. Here, we developed a novel behavioral task and computational framework for studying patch-leaving decisions in head-fixed and freely moving mice in conditions of meta-uncertainty. We stochastically varied between-patch travel time, as well as within-patch reward depletion rate. We find that, when uncertainty is minimal, mice adopt patch residence times in a manner consistent with the MVT and not explainable by simple ethologically motivated heuristic strategies. However, behavior in highly variable environments was best explained by modeling both first- and second-order uncertainty in environmental parameters, wherein local variability and global statistics are captured by a Bayesian estimator and dynamic prior, respectively. Thus, mice forage under meta-uncertainty by employing a hierarchical Bayesian strategy, which is essential for efficiently foraging in volatile environments. The results provide a foundation for understanding the neural basis of decision-making that exhibits naturalistic meta-uncertainty.

Indexed as

Feeding BehaviorModels, BiologicalAnimalsBayes TheoremBehavior, AnimalComputational BiologyComputer SimulationEnvironmentMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLRewardUncertainty

Identifiers

PMID40305584
PMCPMC12068741

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.