ArticlePloS one2025
Control signal dimensionality depends on limb dynamics.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Stroke-Related Changes in Tonic and Phasic Muscle Recruitment During Reaching Reveal Pathway-Specific Motor Deficits.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Stroke-Related Changes in Tonic and Phasic Muscle Recruitment During Reaching Reveal Pathway-Specific Motor Deficits.Journal of central nervous system disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Neural control of movement has to overcome the problem of redundancy in the multidimensional musculoskeletal system. The problem can be solved by reducing the dimensionality of the control space of motor commands, i.e., through muscle synergies or motor primitives. Evidence for this solution exists; multiple studies have obtained muscle synergies using decomposition methods. These synergies vary across different workspaces and are present in both dominant and non-dominant limbs. We explore the effect of biomechanical constraints on the dimensionality of control space. We also test the generalizability of prior conclusions that muscle activity profiles can be explained by applied moments about the limb joints that compensate for dynamic and gravitational forces during reaching. These muscle moments derived from motion capture represent the combined actions of muscle contractions that are under the control of the nervous system. Here, we test the hypothesis that the control space dimensionality is shaped by the complexity of dynamic and gravitational forces. To achieve this, we examined muscle activity patterns across reaching movements in different directions, starting from different postures performed bilaterally by healthy individuals. We used principal component analysis to evaluate the contribution of individual muscles to producing muscle moments across different reaching directions and in both dominant and non-dominant limbs. Extending our earlier work, we find that muscle activity profiles are described well by muscle moment profiles during reaching by both dominant and non-dominant arms. Our results further show that the dimensionality of control signals depends on the complexity of muscle moments, supporting the primary hypothesis. Our results suggest that the neural control strategy for limb dynamics compensation involves the modulation of the co-contraction of proximal and distal antagonistic muscles that change limb stiffness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.