Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305488›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to access among American Indian/Alaska Native people in the US: Results from an online survey.

Sarah T Roberts, Sarah M Hatcher, Erica N Browne, Brigg Reilley, Matthew Bensen, Andrew Freeman, Bob Henne, Ashley Hoover, Monica M Desjardins, Jessica Leston

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Sarah T RobertsWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Oakland, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-3318-9781
Sarah M HatcherApplied Public Health Research Center, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Erica N BrowneWomen's Global Health Imperative, RTI International, Oakland, California, United States of America.
Brigg ReilleyNorthwest Portland Area Indian Health Board, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Matthew BensenCenter for Survey Research Engineering, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Andrew FreemanCenter for Communication and Media Impact, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Bob HenneCenter for Survey Research Engineering, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.
Ashley HooverNorthwest Portland Area Indian Health Board, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.
Monica M DesjardinsApplied Public Health Research Center, RTI International, Durham, North Carolina, United States of America.ORCID 0009-0000-5001-5778
Jessica LestonNorthwest Portland Area Indian Health Board, Portland, Oregon, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCompared to non-Indigenous communities, American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) people are inequitably impacted by HIV, yet few data are available on barriers to pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) use in this population. This study sought to examine PrEP knowledge, attitudes, and perceived barriers to use among AI/AN people in the United States.

methodsA cross-sectional, online survey was administered from January-May 2023 to respondents ≥ 16 years of age who identified as AI/AN. The survey assessed sociodemographic characteristics, PrEP knowledge, attitudes towards PrEP, and experiences with and barriers to PrEP use. Sociodemographic correlates of PrEP knowledge and attitudes were identified using bivariable and multivariable regression models.

resultsThe survey enrolled 403 participants and 354 (87.8%) completed all questions. Respondents had relatively low PrEP knowledge (mean score 4.0 of 9, standard deviation [SD] 3.0). Few (7%) had ever used PrEP. Mean scores on the stigma scales were 2.1 of 5 for stigmatizing PrEP attitudes (SD 0.7), 2.4 of 5 for anticipated stigma (SD 0.56), and 3.0 of 5 for perceived stigma (SD 0.38). Among non-users, 43.1% were not sure if they would be able to get a PrEP prescription if they desired, and 2.7% believed they would not be able to get one. The most common perceived barriers were not knowing where to get PrEP (54.7%) and concerns around discomfort, judgement, and privacy at the health facility (27.3%). In adjusted models, living on tribal/reservation lands was significantly associated with lower PrEP knowledge, higher stigmatizing attitudes, and higher anticipated stigma, and lower PrEP knowledge was associated with higher stigmatizing attitudes and anticipated stigma. Age, gender identity, sexual orientation, urban residence, and strength of connection to indigenous culture were also significantly correlated with one or more outcomes.

conclusionsOur findings underscore the need for widespread sensitization about PrEP in Indigenous communities and for strategies to improve PrEP access and reduce stigma from providers and community members.

Indexed as

American Indian or Alaska NativeHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHealth Services AccessibilityHIV InfectionsIndians, North AmericanPre-Exposure ProphylaxisAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial StigmaSurveys and QuestionnairesUnited States

Identifiers

PMID40305488
PMCPMC12043127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.