ArticlePloS one2025
Prospective follow-up of New York City residents with e-cigarette, or vaping product use-associated lung injury-2020-2021.
Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundA multistate outbreak of e-cigarette, or vaping, product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) occurred in 2019. Because of EVALI's novelty and severity, the New York City (NYC) Department of Health and Mental Hygiene (DOHMH) prospectively assessed sequelae among NYC residents who received an EVALI diagnosis in 2019.
methodsUsing existing NYC EVALI surveillance data, DOHMH attempted contact with all living residents who received an EVALI diagnosis in 2019 and conducted 3 waves of telephone interviews during April 2020-March 2021. Interview questions were adapted from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's EVALI case report form and validated surveys. Baseline differences between respondents and nonrespondents were assessed with Chi-square and Fisher's exact tests; clinical and behavioral characteristics and open-ended responses were summarized.
resultsIn 2019, 53 NYC residents received an EVALI diagnosis; 33 (67%), 14 (29%), and 18 (37%) of 49 living residents participated in the first, second, and third interviews, respectively. Interviews occurred after outpatient diagnosis (6%) or hospital discharge (94%), at a median of 8, 11, and 17 months for each wave. Respondents (N = 33) and nonrespondents (N = 16) did not differ by sex, age, hospitalization status or length. Respondents were mostly male (70%), had a median age of 23 years (range: 16-63 years), and all reported using vaping or e-cigarette products (vaping) with tetrahydrocannabinol (88%), nicotine (49%), or cannabidiol (9%) before diagnosis. Respiratory (first and second interviews) and gastrointestinal (third interviews) symptoms were most commonly reported. Sixteen respondents (49%) reported any new diagnosis during follow-up. Fifteen to 29% of respondents reported vaping at each interview; 58%-93% reported recent non-vaped cannabinoid use.
conclusionNYC residents with EVALI reported symptoms throughout the follow-up period, and approximately half reported newly diagnosed health conditions. Further studies are needed to understand EVALI's relationship with symptoms and health conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.