Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305464›Full record

ArticlePLOS global public health2025

Perceptions of barriers and facilitators for cervical cancer screening from women and healthcare workers in Ghana: Applying the Dynamic Sustainability Framework.

Adwoa Bemah Boamah Mensah, Thomas Okpoti Konney, Ernest Adankwah, John Amuasi, Madalyn Nones, Joshua Okyere, Kwame Ofori Boadu, Felicia Maame Efua Eduah, Serena Xiong, Jeong Robin Moon and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLOS global public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Adwoa Bemah Boamah MensahDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1114-702X
Thomas Okpoti KonneyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medical Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Ernest AdankwahDepartment of Medical Diagnostics, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
John AmuasiGlobal Health Department, School of Public Health, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Madalyn NonesDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.
Joshua OkyereDepartment of Nursing, School of Nursing and Midwifery, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, Kumasi, Ghana.
Kwame Ofori BoaduGhana Health Service, Kumasi South Regional Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti Region, Ghana.
Felicia Maame Efua EduahGhana Health Service, Suntreso Government Hospital, Kumasi, Ashanti Region, Ghana.
Serena XiongDivision of Public Health Sciences, University of Washington, St. Louis, Missouri, United States of America.
Jeong Robin MoonDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York City, New York, United States of America.
Beth VirnigCollege of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8153-7488
Shalini KulasingamDivision of Epidemiology and Community Health, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer screening has reduced cervical cancer-related mortality by over 70% in countries that have achieved high coverage. However, there are significant geographic disparities in access to screening. In Ghana, although cervical cancer is the second most common cancer in women, there is no national-level cervical cancer screening program, and only 2-4% of eligible Ghanaian women have ever been screened for cervical cancer. This study used an exploratory, sequential mixed-methods approach to examine barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening from women's and healthcare workers' perspectives. These were further informed by the Dynamic Sustainability Framework (DSF), in particular, two domains, namely the practice setting and ecological system. Two convenience samples of 215 women and 17 healthcare personnel were recruited for this study. All participants were from one of three selected clinics (Ejisu Government Hospital, Kumasi South Hospital, and the Suntreso Government Hospital) in the Ashanti region of Ghana. Descriptive analyses were used to group the data by practice setting. Statistical differences in means and proportions were used to evaluate women's barriers to cervical cancer screening. Quantitative findings from the women's survey informed qualitative, in-depth interviews with the healthcare workers and were analyzed using an inductive thematic analysis. The median age of women and healthcare workers was 37.0 years and 38.0 years, respectively. Most women (n = 194, 90.2%) reported never having been screened. Women who had not been screened were more likely to have no college or university education. Practice setting factors included long clinic wait times and distance to the clinic. Ecological system factors identified were population characteristics such as lack of knowledge about available services, shyness when undergoing a clinician-performed pelvic exam, and requiring a spouse's permission before scheduling. These findings highlight the need for non-clinician-based, culturally sensitive cervical cancer screening options such as self-collected HPV tests to increase screening participation in Ghana.

Identifiers

PMID40305464
PMCPMC12043171

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.