ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2025
Transcription-Coupled Template Reconfiguration of 8-Oxoguanine for Error-Prone Transcription Revealed by Time-Resolved X-ray Crystallography and Molecular Dynamics.
Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Structural basis of transcription-coupled RNA damage by incorporation of oxidized ribonucleotides.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Oxidative DNA damage, particularly 8-oxoguanine (8OG), is a significant contributor to transcriptional errors that can alter the cellular phenotype and cell fate. While previous studies proposed that 8OG can use its anti-conformation or syn-conformation to form distinct base pairs with different substrates, it is not clear what conformation 8OG adopts during the template loading step and how different substrates induce transcription-coupled conformational changes of the 8OG template within the active site. Through a combined approach of time-resolved X-ray crystallography and molecular dynamics (MD) simulations, our study provides a comprehensive insight into these important questions. We found that the 8OG template behaves very differently for error-free and error-prone transcription. For error-free CTP incorporation, 8OG remains in anti-conformation during template loading, nucleotide binding, and incorporation steps. As for error-prone ATP incorporation, using time-resolved crystallography, we observed that the 8OG template initially adopts anti-conformation during template loading and the initial nucleotide binding step. However, it transitions to the syn-conformation to form a base pair with incoming ATP over the course of the reaction. Eventually, we observed a post-chemistry state where 8OG adopts the syn-conformation, base-paired with newly incorporated AMP. MD simulations further revealed that the 8OG template switches from an anti- to a syn-conformation by partially backtracking and subsequently reloading into the +1 site. These findings significantly contribute to our understanding of how RNA polymerase II navigates 8OG lesions during transcription, shedding light on transcription fidelity control and the lesion bypass of oxidative DNA damage.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.