Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305443›Full record

ArticlePloS one2025

Trends in prevalence and treatment of antepartum and postpartum depression in the United States: Data from the national health and nutrition examination survey (NHANES) 2007 to 2018.

Rebecca M Gardner, Pervez Sultan, Rebecca A Bernert, Julia F Simard

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Rebecca M GardnerDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0001-5292-3219
Pervez SultanDepartment of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.ORCID 0000-0002-7770-0289
Rebecca A BernertDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.
Julia F SimardDepartment of Epidemiology and Population Health, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America.

Funding

Stanford BSSR Pre-Doctoral Training Program at the Intersection of Data Sciences with Behavioral, Social, and Population Health ResearchT32HL151323 · NHLBI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI Michelle Christina Odden, David H Rehkopf · 2020 to 2026
$1.6M
NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL151323
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectives(1) To assess the prevalence of depression and treatment rates in antepartum and postpartum women compared to a control group of reproductive-age women over a 12-year period, and (2) To determine demographic characteristics associated with depression.

methodsNational Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data (2007-2018) were used. 5412 controls, 314 antepartum women, and 455 postpartum women were analyzed. Outcomes included depression prevalence, defined as moderate to severe depressive symptoms measured by Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) scores ≥10 or self-reported antidepressant use; and treatment, defined as antidepressant prescription and/or mental health care services in the past 12 months. Multivariable logistic regression adjusted for age, insurance, race/ethnicity, education, and marital status estimated odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

resultsDepression prevalence was 20.2% in controls (95% CI 18.5-21.9), 9.7% in antepartum (6.3-14.1), and 12.8% in postpartum women (9.3-17.1). Mental health care service utilization increased for postpartum women in 2017-2018 (22.0%, 10.6-37.7). In those with depression, control and postpartum groups had similar treatment rates (70%, p = 0.894) compared to antepartum women (51%, p = 0.051). Antidepressant use was the most common treatment reported in all groups. Those who were married or had private insurance had the lowest depression rates in their respective categories. After adjusting for confounders, antepartum and postpartum women had lower odds of depression compared to controls. When the outcome was PHQ-9 ≥ 10 alone, these associations persisted.

conclusionIn a nationally representative sample, depression prevalence was lower in perinatal women compared to reproductive-age controls, and treatment rates were lowest in antepartum women with prevalent depression. Mental health care services may have increased for postpartum women due to the US Preventive Services Task Force 2016 recommendations, which endorsed psychotherapy for postpartum women. Even so, antidepressants were the most reported treatment among perinatal women, despite psychotherapy being the first-line recommended treatment for this population.

Indexed as

DepressionDepression, PostpartumPregnancy ComplicationsAdolescentAdultAntidepressive AgentsFemaleHumansMental Health ServicesNutrition SurveysPregnancyPrevalenceUnited StatesYoung AdultAntidepressive Agents

Identifiers

PMID40305443
PMCPMC12043162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.