Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305363›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Workplace perk or pitfall? A qualitative study of genetic counselors' perspectives and experiences with workplace genetic testing.

Elizabeth Charnysh, Katherine Hendy, Kerry Ryan, Anya E R Prince, W Gregory Feero, Alyx Vogle, Sarah McCain, Alexandra Truhlar, J Scott Roberts, Charles Lee and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Elizabeth CharnyshThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2444-2009
Katherine HendyDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4128-1649
Kerry RyanCenter for Bioethics and Social Sciences in Medicine, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Anya E R PrinceUniversity of Iowa College of Law, Iowa City, Iowa, USA.
W Gregory FeeroMaine Dartmouth Family Medicine Residency, Augusta, Maine, USA.
Alyx VogleDepartment of Cardiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
Sarah McCainDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Alexandra TruhlarThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
J Scott RobertsDepartment of Health Behavior and Health Equity, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
Charles LeeThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Kunal SanghaviThe Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine, Farmington, Connecticut, USA.
Wendy R UhlmannDepartment of Internal Medicine and Human Genetics, University of Michigan School of Medicine, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
INSIGHT @ Work Consortium

Funding

Genetic Counselors and Workplace Genomic TestingR01HG010679 · NHGRI · JACKSON LABORATORY · PI LEE, CHARLES, ROBERTS, SCOTT · 2020 to 2023
$3.7M
Understanding barriers and facilitators to pharmacogenomic testing in chronic pain careK99HG013600 · NHGRI · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI HENDY, KATHERINE MARIE · 2024 to 2025
$274k
NHGRI NIH HHS K99 HG013600NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010679NHGRI NIH HHS R01HG010679
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Some employers offer genetic testing for increased cancer and cardiovascular disease risk, as well as pharmacogenetic variants, as a wellness benefit, which presents unique considerations for genetic counseling. Our ethical, legal, and social implications (ELSI) of genomics study, positioned in a post-positivist paradigm, aimed to qualitatively assess the perspectives and experiences of genetic counselors (GCs) who had counseled on workplace genetic testing (wGT). Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 18 US GCs who either worked in the wGT industry (i.e., role-directed wGT experience) or provided post-test counseling in a clinical setting (i.e., patient-directed wGT experience). Interviews were analyzed following the principles of codebook thematic analysis using a codebook developed from key domains from the interview guide and emergent themes that were identified during data collection. De-identified transcripts were double-coded. Both role-directed and patient-directed GCs recognized the potential benefits of wGT such as increasing access to genetic services and thereby improving health outcomes. However, patient-directed GCs had more concerns about the lack of access to follow-up care and increasing healthcare disparities. Role-directed GCs were generally more supportive of wGT and were more likely to endorse the benefits. Overall, both role- and patient-directed GCs emphasized the need for guardrails, particularly adequate pre- and post-test education, to mitigate potential harms of wGT, such as lack of informed decision-making, psychological distress, false reassurance, and decisional regret. GCs spontaneously drew parallels between wGT and population genomic screening efforts, noting that wGT similarly attempts to increase access to genetic testing for the general population. GCs' perspectives on strategies to maximize the benefits and minimize the harms of wGT may inform ELSI considerations when developing population genomic screening efforts and other programs that aim to expand access to genetic testing for the general population.

Indexed as

CounselorsGenetic CounselingGenetic TestingWorkplaceAdultFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative Researchconsumer geneticsgenetic counselinggenetic testingpopulation screeningqualitative researchworkplace wellness programs

Identifiers

PMID40305363
PMCPMC12043034

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.