ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025
Pediatric genetic counselor use and perception of various clinic models.
Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Pediatric genetic counselor use and perception of various clinic models.Journal of genetic counseling · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pediatric genetic counseling consistently has the longest referral to appointment time among all genetic counseling specialties. Pediatric genetic counselors (GCs) are utilizing non-traditional clinic models (NTM) in their practices. This study identified the clinic models utilized by GCs and describes GCs' perceptions regarding clinic model use and implementation. Pediatric GCs were recruited via the National Society of Genetic Counselors student research email. Descriptive statistics were used to describe respondent demographics, clinic model types utilized, average monthly patient volume, and genetic counselor perceptions of their clinic model, including barriers, helpful resources, and perceived improvements with NTM implementation. Of the 78 respondents, 80.8% of pediatric GCs were working in a NTM role at least some of the time. The average monthly patient volume was higher for GCs exclusively in NTM and combination clinic roles versus GCs solely in traditional model (TM) roles. The genetic counseling-only clinic was the NTM utilized most among NTM and combination GCs. A higher proportion of GCs working with NTMs agreed they were satisfied with their job, felt supported in the clinic, were at the top of their scope, and provided better patient care than TM GCs. Barriers exist to NTM implementation, and the process was not standardized across clinics. This study provides preliminary evidence showing NTM use can increase pediatric GC patient volume while increasing job satisfaction.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.