ReviewBiochemical Society transactions2025
Functions and mechanisms of eukaryotic RNA-guided programmed DNA elimination.
Review in Biochemical Society transactions, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- The shared evolutionary capacities of plasmids and extrachromosomal DNA.Nature reviews. Genetics · 2026Review
- Non-coding DNA dynamics and its roles as a physical barrier in genome safeguarding across early development and evolution.Heredity · 2026Review
- A sequence motif for DNA double-strand break and telomere healing during programmed DNA elimination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Argonautes and small RNAs associated with nematode programmed DNA elimination.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Many eukaryotic organisms, from ciliates to mammals, employ programmed DNA elimination during their postmeiotic reproduction. The process removes specific regions from the somatic DNA and has broad functions, including the irreversible silencing of genes, sex determination, and genome protection from transposable elements or integrating viruses. Multiple mechanisms have evolved that explain the sequence selectivity of the process. In some cases, the eliminated sequences lack centromeres and are flanked by conserved sequence motifs that are specifically recognized and cleaved by designated nucleases. Upon cleavage, all DNA fragments that lack centromeres are lost during the following mitosis. Alternatively, specific sequences can be destined for elimination by complementary small RNAs (sRNAs) as in some ciliates. These sRNAs enable a PIWI-mediated recruitment of chromatin remodelers, followed up by the precise positioning of a cleavage complex formed from a transposase like PiggyBac or Tc1. Here, we review the known molecular interplay of the cellular machinery that is involved in precise sRNA-guided DNA excision, and additionally, we highlight prominent knowledge gaps. We focus on the modes through which sRNAs enable the precise localization of the cleavage complex, and how the nuclease activity is controlled to prevent off-target cleavage. A mechanistic understanding of this process could enable the development of novel eukaryotic genome editing tools.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.