Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305233›Full record

ArticleJournal of genetic counseling2025

Adolescents' and young adults' reactions to and perceived utility of carrier screening results in the context of a genomic research study.

Haley N Grimes, Michelle L McGowan, Jessica A Sinclair, Cynthia A Prows, Ellen A Lipstein, Melanie F Myers

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of genetic counseling, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Haley N GrimesDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0009-0001-8377-7071
Michelle L McGowanBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Jessica A SinclairBiomedical Ethics Research Program, Department of Quantitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA.
Cynthia A ProwsDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Ellen A LipsteinCollege of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Melanie F MyersDivision of Human Genetics, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6845-5226

Funding

Engaging adolescents in decisions about return of genomic research resultsR01HG010166 · NHGRI · CINCINNATI CHILDRENS HOSP MED CTR · PI MCGOWAN, MICHELLE L, MYERS, MELANIE F · 2019 to 2023
$3.6M
NHGRI NIH HHS R01 HG010166NIH HHS
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although guidelines have historically recommended deferring decisions about learning genomic information for conditions not actionable in childhood until adulthood, youth have increasing access to personal genomic information through research, clinical, and direct-to-consumer testing. However, little is known about young people's reactions to, and perceived future utility of learning genomic information actionable in adulthood. We conducted qualitative interviews with 28 youth ages 15-22 without clinical indications for genetic screening who, through enrollment in a genomic decision-making research study, learned they were carriers of an autosomal recessive condition, or anticipated being carriers but received negative results. Semi-structured interviews occurred virtually between 3 and 16 months after the return of results. Interpretative description guided deductive and inductive coding of transcripts. Of the 28 participants, 21 received positive carrier results, and 7 received negative results. Although some carriers felt the result was unexpected, they expressed relief overall and did not feel worried about their result. Participants with negative results also felt relief about their results. All participants correctly described what a carrier result means, but some carriers could not remember the condition associated with their result. No participant regretted learning personal genomic information, and all reported their results helped them better understand risks to future children. Carriers who perceived the condition for which they were carriers as more severe and/or those familiar with the condition were more likely to remember their result and consider future reproductive options. Carriers also felt testing at their respective age allowed increased familiarity with results and more time to gather information and decide on the personal utility of the information. Our findings suggest early access to genomic information for some youth may allow integration of carrier information over time with minimal adverse effects. More research is needed to assess long-term outcomes among carriers.

Indexed as

Genetic Carrier ScreeningGenetic TestingAdolescentFemaleGenomicsHumansMaleYoung Adultadolescentscarrier screeninggenetic testingreturn of resultsyoung adults

Identifiers

PMID40305233
PMCPMC12043041

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.