Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305163›Full record

ReviewExpert opinion on drug discovery2025

A comprehensive update on the application of high-throughput fluorescence imaging for novel drug discovery.

Michael Ronzetti, Anton Simeonov

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Expert opinion on drug discovery, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Michael RonzettiNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-5034-7692
Anton SimeonovNational Center for Advancing Translational Sciences, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-4523-9977

Funding

Intramural NIH HHS Z99 TR999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHigh-throughput fluorescence imaging (HTFI) is revolutionizing drug discovery by enabling rapid and precise detection of biological targets and cellular processes. Recent advances in fluorescence imaging technologies now provide unprecedented sensitivity, resolution, and throughput. Integration of artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) into HTFI workflows significantly enhances data processing, aiding in hit identification, pattern recognition, and mechanistic understanding. AREAS COVERED: This review outlines recent technological developments, integration strategies, and emerging applications of HTFI. It emphasizes HTFI's role in phenotypic screening, especially for complex diseases such as cancer, neurodegenerative disorders, and viral infections. Additionally, it highlights advances in 3D culture systems, organoids, and organ-on-a-chip technologies, which facilitate physiologically relevant testing, improved predictive accuracy, and translational potential, alongside innovative molecular probes and biosensors. EXPERT OPINION: Despite its advancements, HTFI faces ongoing challenges, including data standardization, integration with multi-omics approaches, and scalability of advanced models. However, recent progress in organoid and 3D modeling technologies has enhanced the physiological relevance of HTFI assays, complemented by sophisticated AI and ML-driven data analysis techniques.

Indexed as

Drug DiscoveryHigh-Throughput Screening AssaysOptical ImagingAnimalsArtificial IntelligenceHumansMachine LearningOrganoids3D modelsartificial intelligencefluorescent probesHigh-throughput fluorescence imagingphenotypic screening

Identifiers

PMID40305163
PMCPMC12105877

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.