Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305086›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2025

Diabetic Retinopathy Screening Among at Risk Populations: Protocol for Distributional Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.

Aleksandra Stanimirovic, Troy Francis, Sonia Meerai, Suja Mathew, Sarah Ibrahim, James M Bowen, Aleksandra PIkula, Valeria Rac

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Aleksandra StanimirovicToronto General Hospital Research Institute, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0000-8066-8876
Troy FrancisToronto General Hospital Research Institute, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7259-0922
Sonia MeeraiFaculty of Education and Health, School of Social Work, Laurentian University, Sudbury, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5309-5213
Suja MathewToronto General Hospital Research Institute, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0009-0001-6031-2140
Sarah IbrahimProgram for Health System and Technology Evaluation, Toronto General Hospital Research Institute, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-3750-2384
James M BowenToronto General Hospital Research Institute, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-6457-2337
Aleksandra PIkulaDepartment of Health Research Methods, Evidence & Impact, Faculty of Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-7077-0148
Valeria RacToronto General Hospital Research Institute, Ted Rogers Centre for Heart Research at Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-0426-4594

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDiabetic retinopathy (DR) remains the primary vision complication of diabetes and the leading cause of blindness among adults, with up to 30% prevalence among low-income populations. Tele-retina is a cost-effective screening alternative to vision loss prevention, yet there is an adverse association between screening and income. Intersectionality theory notes that barriers to achieving health equity result from the intersection of personal and social characteristics. Experiences at this intersection are influenced by interpersonal and structural systems of oppression. Studies have found that tele-retina is the preferred strategy over standard of care screening for at-risk populations. No study has assessed the economic equity impact of DR screening using a theoretical foundation.

objectiveThis study aims to address shortcomings related to the utilization of intersectionality theory in the economic evaluation of DR screening. We propose conducting a distributional cost-effectiveness analysis (DCEA) of the tele-retina program.

methodsThe study will be undertaken using a deductive theoretical drive sequential multimethod approach, consisting of two studies: (1) a modified Delphi study and (2) DCEA. The Delphi panel (patient partners, field experts, and decision makers; N=35-50) will select the social constructs (eg, age, gender) for at-risk populations and potential trade-offs between health maximization and equity. The research will be guided by a social theory framework (intersectionality theory) to understand the impact of social constructs on economic outcomes. Social constructs that are selected by the Delphi panel will be integrated into the validated tele-retina cost-effectiveness analysis model, which will serve as a case study for DCEA.

resultsWe have submitted the research ethics board application to the University Health Network Research Ethics Board and are expecting to begin recruitment for the Delphi study in Spring 2025. We anticipate beginning work on the model in the summer of 2025 and completing it by early 2026.

conclusionsThe Delphi study will provide an understanding of which social factors are deemed necessary by the stakeholders for guiding the inequity in care access. Study results will offer information related to the net health benefit of the intervention and the health equity impact of the tele-retina program, hence providing a more comprehensive valuation of the tele-retina program, which is informative to policy makers and governments whose goal is to mitigate the drivers of health inequities. We anticipate that each of these drivers will raise important questions regarding the implications for decision-making that may have not yet been addressed by Canadian health technology assessment bodies, such as the Canada Drug Agency. This is the first Canadian study to (1) have social constructs for DCEA selected by the Delphi panel, (2) mainstream how health equity framework and social constructs are used in economic assessment, (3) improve DR screening programs by using health equity lens, and (4) scale and adopt "de-novo" integration of social constructs in economic models for program evaluation. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): PRR1-10.2196/60488.

Indexed as

Cost-Benefit AnalysisDiabetic RetinopathyMass ScreeningAdultCost-Effectiveness AnalysisDelphi TechniqueFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedTelemedicinediabetic retinopathydistributional cost-effectiveness analysisequity of carehealth care disparitieshealth equityintersectionalityretinopathy screeningtelehealthtelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID40305086
PMCPMC12079062

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.