Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305018›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2025

High-Deductible Health Plans and Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care for Adults With Chronic Illness.

Risha Gidwani, Veronica Yank, Steven M Asch, Lane Burgette, Aaron Kofner, Alex Peltz, Zachary Wagner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Corporate Profits and the Health of Americans.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Risha GidwaniDivision of Health Care Policy and Research, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora.
Veronica YankUniversity of California, San Francisco.
Steven M AschStanford University, Palo Alto, California.
Lane BurgetteRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.
Aaron KofnerRAND Corporation, Arlington, Virginia.
Alex PeltzRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.
Zachary WagnerRAND Corporation, Santa Monica, California.

Funding

High Deductible Health Plans and Receipt of Recommended Medical CareR01AG072057 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI MARSZOWSKI, RISHA GIDWANI · 2022 to 2025
$2.9M
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG072057
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: High-deductible health plans (HDHPs) are a common insurance mechanism. Objective: To evaluate whether HDHPs are meeting the medical needs of persons with chronical illness. Design, Setting, and Participants: This longitudinal cohort study used 2016 to 2019 national administrative and claims data from MarketScan. Cohort members were adults aged 18 to 64 years with asthma, diabetes, hypertension, coronary artery disease, heart failure, or major depressive disorder. The treatment group was persons newly enrolling in an HDHP; the control group was persons continuously enrolled in non-HDHPs. Data were analyzed from October 2022 to April 2024, with revisions conducted between December and January 2025. Exposure: New enrollment in an HDHP was instrumented by firms changing the plan choice options to promote HDHP enrollment (ie, restricted-choice firms). Analyses used difference-in-differences models combined with this instrumental variable. Entropy balancing was used to address residual confounding. Main Outcomes and Measures: Use of annual recommended medical care, which was abstracted from disease-specific evidence-based clinical practice guidelines and included clinic visits, prescription drugs, laboratory tests, and an overall measure that combined all 3. Results were pooled across disease type to improve policy relevance of findings; disease-specific analyses were also conducted. Hypotheses were formulated prior to data collection. Results: The cohort consisted of 343 137 adults (182 532 [53.20%] female; 149 760 [43.64%] aged 55-64 years [before entropy balancing]). Groups exhibited covariate balance after entropy balancing. Restricted-choice enrollment into an HDHP was associated with reduced use of recommended medical care, with persons in HDHPs reducing their use of recommended clinic visits by 3.1 (95% CI, -4.9 to -1.2) percentage points (P < .001), their use of recommended prescription drugs by 9.0 (95% CI, -11.8 to -6.2) percentage points (P < .001), and their use of recommended annual laboratory testing by 5.7 (95% CI, -8.2 to -3.2) percentage points (P < .001). Overall, HDHP enrollees were 4.7 (95% CI, -6.2 to -3.3) percentage points less likely to receive recommended medical care compared with non-HDHP enrollees (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: This longitudinal cohort study of 343 137 adults with chronic illness found HDHP enrollment was associated with reduced receipt of recommended medical care across a variety of conditions. These results have important implications for recently proposed federal legislation that proposes to exempt chronic illness management from HDHP deductibles.

Indexed as

Deductibles and CoinsuranceGuideline AdherenceInsurance, HealthAdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseFemaleHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedUnited StatesYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID40305018
PMCPMC12044513

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.