Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40305010›Full record

Trial reportJAMA psychiatry2025

Positive Emotion Dysregulation in Opioid Use Disorder and Normalization by Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Eric L Garland, Justin Hudak, Adam W Hanley, Edward Bernat, Brett Froeliger

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in JAMA psychiatry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02602535 (Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement For Chronic Pain and Prescription Opioid Misuse in Primary Care), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02602535 nacompletednot on this map

Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement For Chronic Pain and Prescription Opioid Misuse in Primary Care

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of UtahRan2016 to 2020Enrolled250ConditionsChronic Pain, Opioid Use DisordersArmsMindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement, Support Group
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Eric L GarlandDepartment of Psychiatry, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla.
Justin HudakCollege of Social Work, University of Utah, Salt Lake City.
Adam W HanleyCollege of Nursing, Florida State University, Tallahassee.
Edward BernatDepartment of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park.
Brett FroeligerDepartments of Psychiatry and Cognitive Neuroscience Systems, University of Missouri, Columbia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: It remains unknown whether difficulties in positive emotion regulation (ER) drive opioid use disorder (OUD) and whether these difficulties may be remediated. Objective: To test whether OUD is associated with attenuated positive ER and whether such positive emotion dysregulation may be treated by mindfulness-based intervention. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this mechanistic substudy of a randomized clinical trial, patients with chronic pain who did and did not meet criteria for OUD (OUD+ and OUD-, respectively) were recruited from primary care and pain clinics in Utah from January 2016 to and January 2020 and completed a positive ER task and questionnaires. A subsample of participants at risk for opioid misuse were randomized 1:1 to 8 weeks of Mindfulness-Oriented Recovery Enhancement (MORE) or supportive group (SG) therapy and then completed the ER task at posttreatment and questionnaires through 3-month follow-up. Data were analyzed from December 2022 to June 2024. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary mechanistic outcome was parietal late positive potential (LPP) and P300 amplitude during positive ER. Secondary outcomes included self-reported anhedonia, positive affect, attention to positive information, and opioid craving. Results: The 160 participants used opioids for a mean (SD) duration of 9.7 (8.4) years, and 98 participants (61.3%) were classified as OUD+. Mean (SD) participant age was 53.7 (11.9) years, and 102 participants (63.8%) were female. A significant group × task strategy (View, Regulate) interaction was observed during positive ER, characterized by the OUD+ group exhibiting lower LPP responses during Regulate compared to View trials relative to the OUD- group (B = 1.91; 95% CI, 0.85-2.96; P < .001). A significant group × strategy interaction was also observed for the P300 (B = 1.40; 95% CI, 0.14-2.67; P = .03). LPP blunting during positive ER mediated the association between OUD status and elevated opioid craving. In the treatment subsample (n = 62), patients treated with MORE showed greater increases in the LPP during Regulate compared with View trials than patients treated with SG (B = 1.53; 95% CI, 0.33-2.73; P = .01). Additionally, MORE improved attention to positive information (B = 1.32; 95% CI, 1.14-5.57; P = .004), positive affect (B = 4.73; 95% CI, 1.22-8.24; P = .01), and anhedonia (B = 2.94; 95% CI, 0.58-5.31; P = .02) while reducing craving (B = -10.88; 95% CI, -21.29 to -0.48; P = .04) to a greater extent than SG. Higher positive ER efficacy predicted lower craving at follow-up (B = -2.38; 95% CI, -4.55 to -0.21; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: OUD among patients with chronic pain is characterized by difficulties in positive ER, evident in neurophysiological markers of salience detection and emotional elaboration. In this study, training in mindfulness and savoring via MORE enhanced positive ER, which in turn reduced craving, indicating that interventions that normalize reward system function may remediate OUD. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02602535.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEmotional RegulationMindfulnessOpioid-Related DisordersAdultAnhedoniaEvoked PotentialsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSecondary Data Analysis

Identifiers

PMID40305010
PMCPMC12044540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.