ArticleMedical physics2025
X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using neural attenuation field prior.
Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning-based metal artifact reduction in CT for head and neck radiotherapy.Physics and imaging in radiation oncology · 2026Review
- X-ray CT metal artifact reduction using neural attenuation field prior.Medical physics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe presence of metal objects in computed tomography (CT) imaging introduces severe artifacts that degrade image quality and hinder accurate diagnosis. While several deep learning-based metal artifact reduction (MAR) methods have been proposed, they often exhibit poor performance on unseen data and require large datasets to train neural networks. PURPOSE: In this work, we propose a sinogram inpainting method for metal artifact reduction that leverages a neural attenuation field (NAF) as a prior. This new method, dubbed NAFMAR, operates in a self-supervised manner by optimizing a model-based neural field, thus eliminating the need for large training datasets.
methodsNAF is optimized to generate prior images, which are then used to inpaint metal traces in the original sinogram. To address the corruption of x-ray projections caused by metal objects, a 3D forward projection of the original corrupted image is performed to identify metal traces. Consequently, NAF is optimized using a metal trace-masked ray sampling strategy that selectively utilizes uncorrupted rays to supervise the network. Moreover, a metal-aware loss function is proposed to prioritize metal-associated regions during optimization, thereby enhancing the network to learn more informed representations of anatomical features. After optimization, the NAF images are rendered to generate NAF prior images, which serve as priors to correct original projections through interpolation. Experiments are conducted to compare NAFMAR with other prior-based inpainting MAR methods.
resultsThe proposed method provides an accurate prior without requiring extensive datasets. Images corrected using NAFMAR showed sharp features and preserved anatomical structures. Our comprehensive evaluation, involving simulated dental CT and clinical pelvic CT images, demonstrated the effectiveness of NAF prior compared to other prior information, including the linear interpolation and data-driven convolutional neural networks (CNNs). NAFMAR outperformed all compared baselines in terms of structural similarity index measure (SSIM) values, and its peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR) value was comparable to that of the dual-domain CNN method.
conclusionsNAFMAR presents an effective, high-fidelity solution for metal artifact reduction in 3D tomographic imaging without the need for large datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.