Evidence map›Paper›PMID 40304999›Full record

ArticleClinical drug investigation2025

Early Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Intra-articular Delivery of a PBAE-DEX Conjugate for Osteoarthritis in a UK Population.

Stefano Perni, Swathika Subburaman, Polina Prokopovich

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical drug investigation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Stefano PerniSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Redwood Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3NB, UK.
Swathika SubburamanSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Redwood Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3NB, UK.
Polina ProkopovichSchool of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cardiff University, Redwood Building, King Edward VII Avenue, Cardiff, CF10 3NB, UK. prokopovichp@cf.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5700-9570

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOsteoarthritis affects the cartilage tissue lining the joint. Current management plans often require intra-articular injections to relieve symptoms. This approach is hindered by the difficulty in localising the drug released in the synovial fluid into the cartilage surrounding the affected joint. Drug delivery systems have been developed to support cartilage drug uptake, potentially reducing the number of injections required. We developed an approach to drug localisation that exploits the highly electrostatically charged nature of cartilage constituents through binding biologically active molecules to positively charged polymers, and demonstrated high efficacy and safety in ex vivo tests.

objectivesWe wanted to demonstrate the potential value of cartilage drug localisation technology beyond a clinical perspective, through health economic considerations and cost-effectiveness analysis, in order for these technologies to reach patients. We also conducted threshold analyses to determine, for different effectiveness levels of reducing injections, at what price the treatment will be cost-effective.

methodsWe conducted an early health economic analysis of our technology, developing a cost-effectiveness model with a Markov structure. The analyses were conducted from an NHS perspective and the model was also used to estimate potential cost-effectiveness depending on target product profiles. The health states quality of life values were derived for a UK population through EQ-5D questionnaires collected and analysed in a Bayesian framework.

resultsAt the cost and effectiveness values set for the new treatment, it was cost-effective (increased costs of £16.28 and 0.001126 QALY per patient, resulting in an incremental cost-effectiveness ratios [ICER] of £14,459/QALY) but the results were highly uncertain (at a willingness-to-pay [WTP] of £20,000 and £30,000/QALY the probability of being cost-effective was 56.5% and 67.3%, respectively); while sensitivity analyses (one-way deterministic and probabilistic), within plausible ranges of model parameters, revealed that the efficacy of the technology in reducing intra-articular injections and its cost are the most influential parameters.

conclusionsClinical trials are needed to validate the in vivo drug delivery system efficacy, but our study suggests that the system is likely to be a cost-effective use of NHS resources, also improving healthcare providers capacity.

Indexed as

Drug Delivery SystemsOsteoarthritisCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansInjections, Intra-ArticularMarkov ChainsQuality-Adjusted Life YearsUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.